Redundancy

Redundancy should not be imported thereto.

Redundancy cannot be attributed to legislature.

Each and every word used in a statute was to be given meaning and redundancy was not to be attributed to words used by the legislature.

Every word used in a statue has to be given effect to and no word of provisions of a statute is to be treated as surplusage and redundant

Letter of law has to be interpreted in the sense it has been used and expressed

Words used are to be construed in their ordinary and natural sense.

Redundancy cannot be attributed to Legislature.

Not legal or proper to apply one provision of law in isolation from the other provision as surplusages or redundancy cannot be attributed to the legislature.

Interpretation which rendered a provision of the Constitution redundant, could not be attributed to the framers of the Constitution.

Every attempt should be made to save the statute rather than to declare its provisions redundant.

Statutory provision must be interpreted within meaning that was attributed to it by language and specific words used by Legislature

Redundancy cannot be attributed to any word used therein and while interpreting law a specific provision of any statute which is independent in nature should not ordinarily be held to be redundant especially on touchstone of another in dependent provision of same statute

All possible efforts should be made to apply and adhere to rules of purposive and harmonious construction so that allegedly conflicting provisions should be reconciled and saved.

Provision of law is not to be interpreted in a manner which may render another provision as superfluous, redundant or nugatory.

Courts cannot assume role of legislature by addition or substitution of words in a statute.

Court is supposed to construe provisions of a legislative enactment so that it is in consonance with what legislature intended

Every word must be given meaning and effect, since redundancy cannot be imputed to legislature.