Home Maxims & Terms Decree in administration suit meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Decree in administration suit

Decree in administration suit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 563 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 295 & 278Chief Court (Sindh) Rules (OS), Chap. XXII, R.413Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XX, R.13 & S.114SuccessionProcedure in contentious casesDecree in administration suitNature of order under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925Conversion of proceedings under Succession Act, 1925 to a suit of administration under O. XX, R.13, C.P.C.

Petitioner sought review of order passed by High Court under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925, whereby in view of contentious nature of succession proceedings, application seeking issuance of letters of administration were converted into a civil suit

Contention of applicant inter alia was that impugned order, which converted proceedings into suit for administration and stated that the preliminary decree be passed was contrary to law; and the suit should be regular suit and not a suit for administration

Validity

Impugned order identified the parties and identified as to who should be the plaintiff and defendant and mentioned that the suit would be in the form of a suit for administration of the properties of the deceased and therefore all ingredients of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 and O.XX, C.P.C. were fully adhered to

When parties were legal heirs of the deceased and were contesting with regard to share in property left by the deceased, in such situation any one of the legal heirs could file a suit for administration of properties or file an application under S.278 of the Succession Act, 1925 for grant of "letter of administration" and in terms of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 in the case where there was contention, then proceedings were supposed to be converted as nearly as they could be, into a "regular suit" according to provisions of the C.P.C.

Court in the impugned order exercised powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction and once an order was passed, the court also had power to take further steps to minimize delay in disposal of dispute and the court was under a statutory obligation to pass an order for preliminary decree

Use of the word "shall" in O.XX, R.13, C.P.C. was of mandatory nature, and the C.P.C. did not envisage any other form a suit except for a suit for administration of properties under O.XX, C.P.C.

No error on the face of record was found in the impugned order

Review application was rejected, in circumstances.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 13(1)Decree in administration suitObject

According to O. XX, R. 13(1), court was competent to entertain a suit for account of any property and for the due administration under decree of court

Order XX, R. 13(1), C.P.C. was not confined or restricted to estate of deceased only but object thereof was administration of any property under decree of court for an ultimate object of ordering such accounts inquiries to be taken and made.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 13Decree in administration suitScope

Administration of estates was not limited or confined to estate of deceased only but court was competent to undertake such proceedings in respect of any property.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 13Decree in administration suitAdministration of estate, object and scope of

Administration of estate was a temporary step/arrangement not only to pay up/clear liabilities of the deceased but to safeguard interests and rights of all legal heirs for which they would be entitled under law of inheritance which governed them

Object and scope of administration suit relate and revolve around law of inheritance which always demand clearing of liabilities of deceased first and distribution of remaining assets among heirs later.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 13Decree in administration suitDistribution of estate, object of

Object of distribution of remaining estate among those entitled to it was also sufficient to show that scope did not restrict right to file an administration suit to those only who were alive at time of death of deceased

Administration was confined to what deceased had left at time of his/her death

Distribution of estate of a deceased among legal heirs after payment of debts and legacy was a divine direction which in no way could be denied on plea of death of one of legal heir of deceased during intervening period when necessity arose to seek partition or administration

Question of one to be heir or otherwise could well be inquired and determined by court trying administration suit and it gave rise to another question that when normally matter of inheritance was covered through ordinary suit then why law had provided another mechanism for purpose which otherwise appeared to be one of inheritance.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, R. 13Decree in administration suitInquiry, object of

Purpose and object of inquiry was to determine the estate of deceased left at time of death and temporary administration till payment of debts and liabilities out of such estate and finally division/distribution and partition of remainings amongst legal heirs, entitled at such time.

2017 CLCN 177 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XX, Rr. 13 & 18Decree in administration suitSpecific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 8"Administration suit" or a "suit for partition" were altogether different from character and natureSuit for administration was one which qualified the conditions laid for the same as per O. XX, Rr. 13 & 18, C.P.C.

Suit for partition was controlled by S. 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 and manner of recording decree was provided by O. XX, R. 18, C.P.C.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Decree in administration suit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961039

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decree in administration suit"

PLD 2017
2017-April-10

P L D 2017 Sindh 563

Sheikh HAROON BUKSH — Petitioner Versus Shaikh TAHIR BUKSH and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLCN 2017
2015-May-13

2017 C L C Note 177

KHAIR MUHAMMAD KHATIAN and 5 others — Plaintiffs Versus LIAQUAT ALI G. KAZI and 9 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLC 2018
2017-August-15

2018 C L C 390

ANEES VAYYANI — Plaintiff Versus Mst. ZARINA VAYANI and 6 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 1977
Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1902 of 1975 in Suit No. 240 of 1971, decided on 13th August 1976.

P L D 1977 Karachi 8

HUSSAIN‑Plaintiff Versus MANSOOR ALI AND 5 OTHERS‑Defendants

Court: 0. I, r. 10‑Parties to suit‑Court has discretion in matter of joinder of parties‑Decision whether a particular party a necessary party to suit‑Depends on determination of character and nature of gait.‑Joinder of parties.
PLD 1983
Suit No. 279 of 1978, decided on 9th January, 1983.

P L D 1983 Karachi 382

MUHAMMAD SULAIMAN MALIK AND ANOTHER-Plaintiffs Versus ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- S. 2(15)-Instrument of partition-Definition--If by an instrument, co-owners of any property divide or agree to divide such property in definite separate shares, it will be treated as instrument of partition Definition also covers orders passed by Revenue Authority or any Civil Court for effecting a partition-Award of Arbitrator directing a partition also to be treated as instrument of partition.-Words and phrases.
PLD 2017
2016-May-3

P L D 2017 Sindh 324

SAIFULLAH KHAN and others — Appellants Versus Mst. AFSHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1981
Suit No. 254 of 1977, decided on 7th October, 1980.

_

Before Nasir Aslam Zahid, J Versus Mst. SHAHIDA AND 4 others ‑Respondents

Court: O. XXIX, r. 13‑Administration suit‑Maintainability‑Whether administration suit maintainable or not, held, depends on pleadings of each particular case.‑Pleadings.
CLC 2024
2022-November-2

2024 C L C 2084

CHANAN alias Channu and others — Petitioners Versus HASSAN RAZA and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1996
Suit No. 387 of 1981 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 338 of 1990, decided on 12th January, 1993.

1996 C L C 1847

GHULAM JILANI and 10 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus ABDUL KADIR and 17 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1949
Civil Revision No. 25 of 1948, decided on 16th June 1999, from the order of Sub‑Judge, 1st Class, Lahore, dated 30th March 1948.

P L D 1949 Lahore 263

MAHBUB ALAM‑Petitioner Versus RAZIA BEGUM and others‑Respondents

Court: