Decree in administration suit
Decree in administration suit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner sought review of order passed by High Court under S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925, whereby in view of contentious nature of succession proceedings, application seeking issuance of letters of administration were converted into a civil suit
Contention of applicant inter alia was that impugned order, which converted proceedings into suit for administration and stated that the preliminary decree be passed was contrary to law; and the suit should be regular suit and not a suit for administration
Validity
Impugned order identified the parties and identified as to who should be the plaintiff and defendant and mentioned that the suit would be in the form of a suit for administration of the properties of the deceased and therefore all ingredients of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 and O.XX, C.P.C. were fully adhered to
When parties were legal heirs of the deceased and were contesting with regard to share in property left by the deceased, in such situation any one of the legal heirs could file a suit for administration of properties or file an application under S.278 of the Succession Act, 1925 for grant of "letter of administration" and in terms of S.295 of the Succession Act, 1925 in the case where there was contention, then proceedings were supposed to be converted as nearly as they could be, into a "regular suit" according to provisions of the C.P.C.
Court in the impugned order exercised powers of a court of original civil jurisdiction and once an order was passed, the court also had power to take further steps to minimize delay in disposal of dispute and the court was under a statutory obligation to pass an order for preliminary decree
Use of the word "shall" in O.XX, R.13, C.P.C. was of mandatory nature, and the C.P.C. did not envisage any other form a suit except for a suit for administration of properties under O.XX, C.P.C.
No error on the face of record was found in the impugned order
Review application was rejected, in circumstances.
According to O. XX, R. 13(1), court was competent to entertain a suit for account of any property and for the due administration under decree of court
Order XX, R. 13(1), C.P.C. was not confined or restricted to estate of deceased only but object thereof was administration of any property under decree of court for an ultimate object of ordering such accounts inquiries to be taken and made.
Administration of estates was not limited or confined to estate of deceased only but court was competent to undertake such proceedings in respect of any property.
Administration of estate was a temporary step/arrangement not only to pay up/clear liabilities of the deceased but to safeguard interests and rights of all legal heirs for which they would be entitled under law of inheritance which governed them
Object and scope of administration suit relate and revolve around law of inheritance which always demand clearing of liabilities of deceased first and distribution of remaining assets among heirs later.
Object of distribution of remaining estate among those entitled to it was also sufficient to show that scope did not restrict right to file an administration suit to those only who were alive at time of death of deceased
Administration was confined to what deceased had left at time of his/her death
Distribution of estate of a deceased among legal heirs after payment of debts and legacy was a divine direction which in no way could be denied on plea of death of one of legal heir of deceased during intervening period when necessity arose to seek partition or administration
Question of one to be heir or otherwise could well be inquired and determined by court trying administration suit and it gave rise to another question that when normally matter of inheritance was covered through ordinary suit then why law had provided another mechanism for purpose which otherwise appeared to be one of inheritance.
Purpose and object of inquiry was to determine the estate of deceased left at time of death and temporary administration till payment of debts and liabilities out of such estate and finally division/distribution and partition of remainings amongst legal heirs, entitled at such time.
Suit for partition was controlled by S. 8 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 and manner of recording decree was provided by O. XX, R. 18, C.P.C.
"Decree in administration suit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961039
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Decree in administration suit"
P L D 2017 Sindh 563
Sheikh HAROON BUKSH — Petitioner Versus Shaikh TAHIR BUKSH and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 C L C Note 177
KHAIR MUHAMMAD KHATIAN and 5 others — Plaintiffs Versus LIAQUAT ALI G. KAZI and 9 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh2018 C L C 390
ANEES VAYYANI — Plaintiff Versus Mst. ZARINA VAYANI and 6 others — Defendants
Court: SindhP L D 1977 Karachi 8
HUSSAIN‑Plaintiff Versus MANSOOR ALI AND 5 OTHERS‑Defendants
Court: 0. I, r. 10‑Parties to suit‑Court has discretion in matter of joinder of parties‑Decision whether a particular party a necessary party to suit‑Depends on determination of character and nature of gait.‑Joinder of parties.P L D 1983 Karachi 382
MUHAMMAD SULAIMAN MALIK AND ANOTHER-Plaintiffs Versus ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 2(15)-Instrument of partition-Definition--If by an instrument, co-owners of any property divide or agree to divide such property in definite separate shares, it will be treated as instrument of partition Definition also covers orders passed by Revenue Authority or any Civil Court for effecting a partition-Award of Arbitrator directing a partition also to be treated as instrument of partition.-Words and phrases.P L D 2017 Sindh 324
SAIFULLAH KHAN and others — Appellants Versus Mst. AFSHAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court_
Before Nasir Aslam Zahid, J Versus Mst. SHAHIDA AND 4 others ‑Respondents
Court: O. XXIX, r. 13‑Administration suit‑Maintainability‑Whether administration suit maintainable or not, held, depends on pleadings of each particular case.‑Pleadings.2024 C L C 2084
CHANAN alias Channu and others — Petitioners Versus HASSAN RAZA and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1996 C L C 1847
GHULAM JILANI and 10 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus ABDUL KADIR and 17 others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1949 Lahore 263
MAHBUB ALAM‑Petitioner Versus RAZIA BEGUM and others‑Respondents
Court: