Home Maxims & Terms Devolution to Provinces meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Devolution to Provinces

Devolution to Provinces legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 640 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 270AA, 254, 90, 91 & 199Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act (X of 2010), Preamble, Ss. 96 & 101Federal Cabinet Office Memorandum/Notification No. 4-3/2012-Min.I dated 14.02.2012Devolution to ProvincesScope, nature and effect of the omission of the Concurrent List by the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010Effect of the cut-off date for devolution provided in Art.270AA(8) of the ConstitutionDeclaration and continuance of laws post Constitutional (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2000

Devolution of an autonomous hospital/research institution under the administrative control of the Federal Government, via the Cabinet Division

Protection under Art. 254 of the Constitution with regards to failure to comply with requirement as to time provided in Art. 270AA(8) of the Constitution

Scope

Petitioners impugned the transfer of the administrative control of "Shaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institution" ("SZPMI") from the Federal Government to the Provincial Government vide Cabinet Office Memorandum/Notification No.4-3/2012-Min.I dated 14.02.2012 on orders of the Prime Minister

Contention of the petitioners inter alia was that the said transfer was illegal and unconstitutional as the devolution of "SZPMI" did not have legal sanction

Contention of the respondents, inter alia, was that the "SZPMI" having been established by a Trust Deed was an autonomous Department of the Federal Government and had been competently devolved to the administrative control of the Province

Validity

Perusal of the alleged Trust Deed clearly reflected that none of its objects specifically provided that any research institution was to be established in Lahore or anywhere else and the Federation of Pakistan had failed to show nexus of the Trust Deed with the "SZPMI" or failed to show that the purported Trust was instrumental in any activity involved in the creation of the "SZMPI" or purchase land for the same

Said devolution of the "SZPMI" took place on 14.02.2012 much after the cut-off date provided in Art.270AA(8) of the Constitution which could not be regarded as a mere irregularity curable under Art.254 of the Constitution

Keeping in view the role of the Implementation Committee constituted for the purpose of devolution, it was clear that the process for devolution of the "SZPMI" could only be legally and validly completed in terms of Arts.270AA(8) & 270AA(9) of the Constitution

Impugned Office Memorandum/Notification was issued by the Prime Minister to the exclusion of the Cabinet, and per Art.90 of the Constitution, the Prime Minister alone was not the Federal Government, therefore, the same did not carry legal sanction behind it and as such was liable to be struck down on the Constitutional plane

High Court held that "SZPMI" was an institution established by the Federal Government and not by the purported Trust Deed and therefore all notifications regarding the Trust and Board of Trustees were held to be ultra vires of the Constitution and of no legal effect; and that the impugned Notification/Office Memorandum was unconstitutional and coram non judice and all acts made pursuant to the transfer shall cease to have any legal effect

High Court further held that the "SZPMI" stood restored to the Federal Government in the position before the issuance of the Notification/Office Memorandum and was returned to the administrative control of the Federation, and all the appointments made by the Provincial Government were held to be void ab inito

High Court directed that the Federal and Provincial Governments shall cooperate and provide full assistance in so far as the transfer was concerned

Constitutional petitions were allowed, accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Devolution to Provinces", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961041

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Devolution to Provinces"

PLD 2017
2017-June-16

P L D 2017 Lahore 640

ALL PAKISTAN PARAMEDICAL STAFF FEDERATION UNIT, SZPMI, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2017
2016-July-4

P L D 2017 Sindh 347

Dr. NADEEM RIZVI and 7 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC 2013
Writ Petitions Nos.1579 and 5081 of 2012, decided on 12th April, 2012.

2013 P L C 143

Syed IMRAN ALI SHAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Human Resources (HR) Division, Islamabad and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2013
S.M.C. No.15 of 2010, C.M.As. Nos.2689, 3244 of 2010, 5383, 3068 of 2011, H.R.C. No.44517-K of 2010, H.R.C. No.13938-P of 2010, H.R.C. No.22070-P of 2011 and Constitutional Petition No.74 of 2011, decided on 21st November, 2012.

2013 P L C (C

MUZAFFAR KHAN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2013
S.M.C. No.15 of 2010, C.M.As. Nos.2689, 3244 of 2010, 5383, 3068 of 2011, H.R.C. No.44517-K of 2010, H.R.C. No.13938-P of 2010, H.R.C. No.22070-P of 2011 and Constitution Petition No.74 of 2011, decided on 21st November, 2012.

2013 S C M R 304

MUZAFFAR KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 2017
Civil Appeal No. 1109 of 2013 and Civil Appeals Nos. 1424 to 1428 of 2014, decided on 14th April, 2016.

2017 P L C 1

NEMAT ULLAH and others Versus CHAIRMAN GOVERNING BODY, WORKER WELFARE BOARD/SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KPK, LABOUR DEPARTMENT and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2016
Civil Appeal No. 1109 of 2013 and Civil Appeals Nos. 1424 to 1428 of 2014, decided on 14th April, 2016.

2016 S C M R 1299

NEMAT ULLAH and others — Appellants Versus CHAIRMAN GOVERNING BODY, WORKER WELFARE BOARD/SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KPK, LABOUR DEPARTMENT and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2012
Constitutional Petition No.55 of 2011, decided on 20th June, 2012.

2012 S C M R 1495

MUHAMMAD AKHLAQ KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2020
Civil Appeals Nos. 125-K to 131-K and 2306 to 2309 of 2016 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1254-K and 8973 of 2018 and Civil Petition 2312-L of 2018, decided on 17th January, 2019.

2020 S C M R 1

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Health Department and others — Appellants Versus Dr. NADEEM RIZVI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2019
Civil Appeals Nos. 125-K to 131-K, 2306 to 2309 of 2016, Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1254-K, 8973 of 2018 and Civil Petition No. 2312-L of 2018, decided on 17th January, 2019.

2019 S C M R 556

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Health Department and others — Appellants Versus Dr. NADEEM RIZVI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan