Inculpatory statement
Inculpatory statement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Where prosecution evidence was found to be reliable and the exculpatory part of the accused person's statement was established to be false it had to be excluded from consideration
Inculpatory part of the accused's statement may be read in support of evidence of prosecution
Statement of convict was to be believed in its entirety as ocular account had been found unreliable
Conviction recorded by Trial Court was set aside.
"Inculpatory statement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961734
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inculpatory statement"
2019 P Cr
EJAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court2012 M L D 1894
IMRAN alias SUNNY — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1999 M L D 3344
Mst. MUKHTAR BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1999 P Cr
Mst. MUKHTAR BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2003 PCr
PERVAIZ AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1978 Supreme Court 200
NAJ1B RAZA REHMANI‑Appellant/Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 21‑Confession, retracted‑Corroboration‑No pistol recovered from accused appellant, nor any evidence produced showing appellant having come armed with a pistol or his having kept his movements secret from his brother, lower Court's finding confession having been corroborated by circumstantial evidence "in all material particulars" from accused's confessional statement containing such allegations, held, contrary to evidence on record‑Penal Code XLV of 1860), S. 302.‑Confession.P L D 1993 Peshawar 189
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court:1986 M L D 2718
ABDUL RASHID‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1998 M L D 344
QAYYUM KHAN and another -Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court2018 Y L R 2072
Mst. EZAT SULTANA — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court