Condition
Condition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Law would take its effect from the date of its promulgation and interpretation of said law could not be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment.
Permission of Advocate General for filing writ petition in representative capacity or permission of Court was condition precedent.
Longstanding impugned mutation in favour of a party could not be disturbed due to presumption of truth attached to such entries
Impugned mutation was not challenged by the vendor in his lifetime and defendants had no locus standi to assail the same.
When any condition had been attached with a promissory note then it would bring the same out of the ambit of negotiable instrument
Interest having been included in the promissory note, therefore same was not a negotiable instrument
Presumption was attached to a negotiable instrument but the same was rebuttable
Plaintiff was bound to prove the execution of document in accordance with law
Plaintiff had failed to prove the receipt of money by the defendant
No decree should have been passed in favour of plaintiff, in circumstances
Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court were set aside and suit was dismissed
Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.
Appeal and representation could lie only against an order passed by a "Departmental Authority" with regard to any of the terms and conditions of service.
"Condition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961750
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Condition"
2020 M L D 719
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and another — Petitioners Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1981 P L C 269
GHULAM RABBANI AND 19 OTHERS Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Court: Labour Court N.W. F. P.P L D 1987 Supreme Court 123
SHEIKHUPURA‑Appellant Versus ANJUMAN TALIM‑UL‑ISLAM AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1969 Karachi 363
ABDUL MAJID KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co., KARACHI‑Respondent
Court:2017 P T D 665
AN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1985 Lahore 512
Mo. PATHANI AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus MURTAZA AND 2 others respondents
Court:1997 P Cr
Mst. WAZIRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2024 P T D 158
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE Versus UNIQUE CYCLE INDUSTRY
Court: Lahore High Court1985 C L C 127
GUL MUHAMMAD and 2 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI and 3 others — Respondents
Court: ---S.10(2) read with Statement of Conditions, Conditions No.2,cl. (g) and No. 6, cl. 4--Hari--Condition of residence in same Deh or adjoining Deh or Taps. or district for 10 years prior to 1st July, 1970, held, does not qualify definition of ""hari"" contained in cl. (g) of Condition 2, but it, provides protection to Haris who have resided in same Deh or adjoining Deh or Tapa or district prior to 1st July, .1970 from objection that may be raised at open Kutchery against his entitlement.--Word and phrases"P L D 1970 Karachi 70
ABDUL MAJID KHAN-Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co.
Court: