Home Maxims & Terms Condition meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Condition

Condition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PLC(CS)N 11 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Retrospectivity of statuteCondition

Law would take its effect from the date of its promulgation and interpretation of said law could not be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment.

2019 CLC 877 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S. 44Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 91 & O. I, R. 8Writ petition in representative capacity, filing ofCondition

Permission of Advocate General for filing writ petition in representative capacity or permission of Court was condition precedent.

2019 CLC 1096 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 100Document more than thirty years' oldPresumptionConditionPresumption could not be attached to the document more than thirty years old when defendant had denied the sameParties should prove said document in accordance with lawPresumption of truth was attached to the revenue entries unless rebutted through cogent evidence

Longstanding impugned mutation in favour of a party could not be disturbed due to presumption of truth attached to such entries

Impugned mutation was not challenged by the vendor in his lifetime and defendants had no locus standi to assail the same.

2019 CLC 1836 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O.XXXVII, R.2Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), S.118Summary suit on the basis of promissory noteNegotiable instrumentConditionEffectDocumentProof of

When any condition had been attached with a promissory note then it would bring the same out of the ambit of negotiable instrument

Interest having been included in the promissory note, therefore same was not a negotiable instrument

Presumption was attached to a negotiable instrument but the same was rebuttable

Plaintiff was bound to prove the execution of document in accordance with law

Plaintiff had failed to prove the receipt of money by the defendant

No decree should have been passed in favour of plaintiff, in circumstances

Impugned judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court were set aside and suit was dismissed

Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

2017 PLC(CS) 1128 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 4Appeal before Service TribunalCondition

Appeal and representation could lie only against an order passed by a "Departmental Authority" with regard to any of the terms and conditions of service.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Condition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961750

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Condition"

MLD 2020
2019-December-3

2020 M L D 719

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and another — Petitioners Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLC 1981
Case No. 5 of 1977, decided on 13th June, 1978.

1981 P L C 269

GHULAM RABBANI AND 19 OTHERS Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

Court: Labour Court N.W. F. P.
PLD 1987
Civil Appeal No. 127 of 1984, decided on 12th October, 1986.

P L D 1987 Supreme Court 123

SHEIKHUPURA‑Appellant Versus ANJUMAN TALIM‑UL‑ISLAM AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1969
Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1963, decided on 27th March 1969.

P L D 1969 Karachi 363

ABDUL MAJID KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co., KARACHI‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 2017
N/A

2017 P T D 665

AN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1985
Criminal Revisions Nos. 112 and 138 of 1985, decided on 9th July, 1985.

P L D 1985 Lahore 512

Mo. PATHANI AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus MURTAZA AND 2 others respondents

Court:
PCRLJ 1997
1997-April-2

1997 P Cr

Mst. WAZIRAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2024
Sales Tax Reference No.72126 of 2022, decided on 26th September, 2023.

2024 P T D 158

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE Versus UNIQUE CYCLE INDUSTRY

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1985
Civil Revision No. 99 of 1982, decided on 19th August, 1984.

1985 C L C 127

GUL MUHAMMAD and 2 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI and 3 others — Respondents

Court: ---S.10(2) read with Statement of Conditions, Conditions No.2,cl. (g) and No. 6, cl. 4--Hari--Condition of residence in same Deh or adjoining Deh or Taps. or district for 10 years prior to 1st July, 1970, held, does not qualify definition of ""hari"" contained in cl. (g) of Condition 2, but it, provides protection to Haris who have resided in same Deh or adjoining Deh or Tapa or district prior to 1st July, .1970 from objection that may be raised at open Kutchery against his entitlement.--Word and phrases"
PLD 1970
Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1963, decided on 27th March 1969.

P L D 1970 Karachi 70

ABDUL MAJID KHAN-Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co.

Court: