Home Maxims & Terms Reversion of an employee meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reversion of an employee

Reversion of an employee legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLC 58 NATIONAL-INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS-COMMISSION Judicial Precedent
S.33Redressal of individual grievancesReversion of an employeeScope

Petitioners, who were regular employees, were promoted to next grade after approval of the competent authority but after 35 days they were reverted back to their previous posts

Contention of department was that the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) had promoted certain persons including the petitioners for the next grade, without completion of length of service therefore, the Authority after confirmation of said discrepancies had cancelled the promotions

Validity

Some of the petitioners had not completed the required length of service

Dispatch Rider was 100% direct post and Naib Qasid was not eligible for promotion to that post

One of the petitioners was promoted notwithstanding incomplete ACR (Annual Confidential Report) dossier

One of the petitioners was illegally promoted against a post which was not vacant

Departmental Promotion Committee had illegally recommended the promotions

Minimum length of service as required for promotion to certain post was sine qua non for consideration of promotion

Commission in the interest of justice held that the petitioners would be promoted after removal of illegalities

Petition was disposed of accordingly.

2017 PLC(CS)N 2 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
R. 29Reversion of an employeePetitioners-employees were downgraded from BS-6 to BS-5ValidityEmployees had been reverted to a post to which they never servedImpugned reversion orders were void and defective

Employees, in circumstances, could have been proceeded and punished with any other punishment except reversion, if they had committed any misconduct

Competent authority while imposing the punishment of reversion did not specify length of time which was violative of Fundamental Rules, R.29

Penalty for indefinite period had not been provided in law

Impugned order suffered from legal infirmity which could not be sustained

Order for reversion of employees were declared void, illegal and defective and were set aside

Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reversion of an employee", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124961984

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reversion of an employee"

PLC 1993
Appeal No. SUK‑329 of 1991, decided on 29th November, 1992.

1993 P L C 401

GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE and another Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC 2023
Case Nos.4B(194), C.M.As. Nos.24B(77) of 2016, 7(11) of 2017, Case No.4B(195) in C.M.A. No.24B(78), Case No.4B(197) in C.M.A. 24B(80), Case No.4B(198), C.M.A. No.24B(81), Case No.4B(202) in C.M.A. No.24B(84) and Case No.4B(201) in C.M.A. No.24B(83) of 2016, decided on 20th April, 2020.

2023 P L C 58

Syed TAHIR SHAH and others Versus PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PLC(CS)N 2017
W.P. No.2389-P of 2015, decided on 19th April, 2016.

2017 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ and another Versus CANTONMENT BOARD through Executive Officer, Peshawar and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC(CS) 2003
N/A

2003 P L C (C

RIZWAN AKHTAR Versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB through Vice‑Chancellor, Quaid‑e‑Azam Campus, Lahore and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 1993
Appeal No. 434(9) of 1992, decided on 3rd April, 1993.

1993 P L C (C

ABDUL WAHEED Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 4 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC 1995
Revision Applications Nos. KAR‑79 to M of 1995, decided on 14th March, 1995.

1995 P L C 479

DISTRICT MANAGER, KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KARACHI. Versus AMIR AFZAL and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 1994
Appeal No.23 of 1968, decided on 21st February, 1994.

1994 P L C (C

ABBAS QASIM Versus CHIEF JUSTICE, SINDH HIGH COURT and 2 others

Court: Service Tribunal Sindh
MLD 1986
Constitutional Petition NoD‑779 of 1983,, decided on 15th March, 1986.

1986 M L D 1232

SAEED AHMAD KHAN Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No. 93(K) of 1986, decided on 10th October, 1988.

1989 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD AKBAR Versus THE CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1987
Appeals Nos. Kar. 6 and 7 of 1986, decided on 27th November, 1986.

1987 P L C 498

MUHAMMAD HAMEED and another Versus TRAFFIC MANAGER, KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind