Council of Common Interest
Council of Common Interest legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
When executive authority of Federal Government extends to matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws, it follows that the power of Council of Common Interest to make policy under Art. 154 (1) of the Constitution is also no embargo to policy-making by Federal Government in exercise of its executive authority under Art. 97 of the Constitution.
Standards, guidelines and regulation of the medical profession by the PMDC subject to approval by CCI via Constitutional mandate
Scope
PMDC regulated the medical profession by ensuring that all medical and dental education in Pakistan was imparted by recognized medical or dental institutions that issued recognized degrees and thereafter registered the medical or dental practitioners
PMDC set standards for education and admission in medical and dental colleges in order to ensure that minimum threshold was maintained
Laws relating to medical profession were covered under Part II of the Federal Legislative List, and thus anything done in relation thereto must be placed before the CCI as it was the Constitutional Forum which exercised and supervised control over the PMDC and regulated all policies with respect to the medical profession
Language of Art.154 of the Constitution requiring the CCI to formulate and regulate polices in relation to matters in Part II of the Federal Legislative List meant that there must be a deliberative process before the CCI wherein objectives of relevant policy were discussed along with manner in which it was to be effectuated; which would include the framework of any regulation
Article 154 of the Constitution required the CCI to exercise supervision and control over medical institutions and any regulation with reference to the medical profession could fall within the control and supervision of the CCI
High Court held that all standards, guidelines and recommendations issued by PMDC in furtherance of its mandate, which is to regulate the medical profession, must be approved by the Council of Common Interests.
Council of Common Interests has to regulate and formulate policies for Federation in relation to a number of subjects including electricity and regulatory bodies
Decision of Council of Common Interests has binding/obligatory effect unless the same is modified by the Parliament as provided in Art. 154(7) of the Constitution.
Petitioner was aggrieved of the Memorandum whereby Prime Minister transferred administrative control and had placed five Statutory Regulatory Authorities i.e. National Electric Power Regulatory Authority, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, Frequency Allocation Board, Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority and Public Procurement Regulatory Authority, under the control of Cabinet Division of Federal Government
Validity
Council of Common Interest held a pivotal status in scheme of Federalism
Obstructing or impeding its functions and bypassing or ignoring the forum which was established to strengthen bonds between Federating units would inevitably lead to defeating intent of framers of the Constitution, besides giving rise to unfounded suspicions and doubts
Placement of five Regulatory Authorities was not a matter relating to day-to-day functioning but it fell within the fold of general principles by which Federal Government was to be guided by Council of Common Interests in its management of public affairs; as such the same fell within the expression used in Art.154 of the Constitution and therefore, subject to the exclusive power and jurisdiction vested in the Council of Common interests
Any alternation made in administrative arrangement relating to regulatory authorities was subject to approval of Council of Common Interests
Policy decisions and guidelines of Council of Common Interests were binding on Federal Government, and the Government was not empowered to interfere with the affairs of regulatory authorities other than as provided under Art.154 of the Constitution and relevant legislative enactments
Provision of R.3(3) of Rules of Business, 1973 was subject to Arts.153 & 154 of the Constitution
Memorandum dated 19-12-2016, could not have been issued nor the Prime Minister was empowered to grant approval pursuance to powers vested under R.3(3) of Rules of Business, 1973
High Court declared the Memorandum in question to have been issued in violation of the constitutional mandate and as such was illegal, void and was issued without lawful authority and jurisdiction
Status which existed before issuance of Memorandum in question was restored
Any alteration or amendment of entry 53 of Cl.2 of Rules of Business, 1973 was required approval of Council of Common Interests
Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Council of Common Interest", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124962021
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Council of Common Interest"
P L D 2017 Islamabad 207
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN and 11 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2006 Supreme Court 587
WATTAN PARTY through President and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Committee of Privatization, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2024 Peshawar 83
HYDRO ELECTRIC LABOUR UNION (PESCO), KPK through President — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Energy and Power, Power Division, Lahore and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1996 Karachi 27
AMIN AHMED and 31 others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus MINISTRY OF PRODUCTION GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN,
Court: ‑‑‑‑ Art. 4 as amended by Transfer of Managed Establishments (Amendment) Act (XV of 1991), S.21 ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Fourth Sched., Legislative Lists, Federal Legislative List, Part II, Item 3 ‑‑‑ Privatization of Government managed establishment ‑‑‑ Provision of Fourth Sched., Legislative List, Federal Legislative List, Part II, Item 3 has no application and does not preclude or affect transfer pursuant t ' o the provision of Art. 4, Transfer of Managed Establishments Order, 1978 as amended.P L D 2013 Lahore 659
Syed FEROZE SHAH GHILLANI and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2003 Lahore 629
KHALID MAHMOOD and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 74 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2026 P T D (Trib
Messrs HUFFAZ SEAMLESS PIPE INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER (APPEALS-III), SINDH REVENUE BOARD, KARACHI and another
Court: Appellate Tribunal Sindh Revenue BoardP L D 2020 Sindh 242
QURBAN ALI SHAH and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2018 Sindh 657
MUHAMMAD ARIF AKHTAR and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2014 Sindh 504
K - ELECTRIC LIMITED and another — Plaintiffs Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Defendants
Court: High Court