Substitution for real culprit
Substitution for real culprit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Nobody would spare the actual culprit for such a crime and would falsely implicate an innocent person, when there was no previous enmity.
"Substitution for real culprit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124962070
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Substitution for real culprit"
1989 M L D 3288
SIDDIQUE and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1986 P Cr
ANWAR‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1987 M L D 3103
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1980 Lahore 438
MANZOOR HUSSAIN-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: S. 302-Evidence, appreciation of-Eye-witnesses of occurrence natural, being inmates of house, their evidence confidence-inspiring, finding corroboration from medical evidence and an independent witness-Mere relationship of such witnesses with deceased-Held Could not impair veracity of eye-witness account of incident faithfully given by them-Accused having a motive to kill deceased, named in F. I. R. promptly lodged by complainant and not likely to have been falsely substituted for real culprit because of his relationship with complainant-Offence, held, brought home to accused, under S. 302, P.P.C.-Conviction maintained, in circumstances.-Evidence.P L D 1984 Supreme Court 22
P L D 1984 Supreme Court 22 Versus Criminal Appeal No. K-14 of 1981, heard on 7th August, 1983.
Court: -= Ss. 302/34, 323/34 & 452-Strained relationship of accused person with deceased being motive of offence, proved by evidence on record Telephonic message about firing promptly communicated to police station and Investigating Officer reaching place of occurrence within minutes-Person lodging First Information Report being himself injured and witness of whole occurrence indeed a competent person-No possibility of accused being substituted for real culprits or real culprits remaining unknown-Witnesses varied and most natural ones that could be produced-Ocular evidence provided by natural witnesses who were. of different categories-No possibility in recovery, of doing away with weapons of offence or with clothes, enlistment of independent recovery witness, therefore, of no material difference to result - Fire-arm injuries on deceased caused by pistol as recovered at instance of accused-No inference favourable to accused could possibly be drawn from nature of pellet injuries-Held, conviction of accused was just and proper and there was no mitigating factor for interference in sentence in circumstances.-Sentence.1985 P Cr
NOOR MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2017 Peshawar 179
AQAL ZAMEER — Appellant Versus MOHI-UD-DIN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court1985 M L D 1353
SAGHIR HUSSAIN and others — Appellants, Versus THE STATE — Respondent.
Court: Lahore1983 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SADIQ-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Lahore