Juristic interpretation
Juristic interpretation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Confession means a statement made by an accused which must either admit in terms of the offence or at any rate substantially all the facts which constitute the offence.
"Juristic interpretation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124962080
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Juristic interpretation"
2017 P Cr
NAEEM SHAHZAD — Appellant Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1964 (W
Mst. KHURSHID JAN‑Appellant Versus FAZAL DAD‑Respondent
Court: (iii) How are the Courts to be guided in case of conflict of views among the founders of different Schools of Muslim Law and their disciples, other Imams and Faqihs last question as amended by the Full Bench.P L D 2021 Federal Shariat Court 28
IRUM MALIK — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: High Court1999 S C M R 1309
Chief Executive/Managing, Director — Petitioner Versus Messrs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED,
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1973 Karachi 594
RIZVI TRADERS LTD.‑‑Appellant Versus J. TYLER & Co., LTD. AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1960 Dacca 416
Syed SAYEEDUDDIN AHMED‑Appellant Versus Haji IUNUS MIA‑Respondent
Court:2000 P T D 209
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Court: 238 I T R 4662013 M L D 1711
KHAWAR IQBAL through Attorney — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Law and Justice, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat CourtP L D 1981 Supreme Court 56
Mst. ZAINAB BIBI AND others‑Appellants Versus Mst. BILQIS BIBI AND others‑Respondents
Court: ‑ . Ss. 47 & 67‑Handwriting and signatures‑Proof‑Person alleged to have issued and signed a certificate going blind‑Certificate required to be proved through some one familiar with handwriting of person signing same ‑ Appellant examining a witness and such witness identifying signatures of signatory and also stating certificate itself having been in signatory's handwriting‑Witness not cross‑examined on point and nothing improbable in his claim of being familiar with signatory's handwriting‑Certificate, held, brought within ambit of S. 67 and onus shifted to respondent to prove same having been a forged document.‑Handwriting.P L D 1980 Supreme Court 160
Present : Aslam Blaz Hussain, Karam Elahee Chauhan and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ Versus Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1129 of 1976, decided on 7th June 1980.
Court: (c) Divine Law - Steps to be taken to find out,-Muhammadan Law-Sources.