Essential characteristics
Essential characteristics legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
For determining whether such right had been infringed, the court had to ask, first, whether the thing in issue was property; second, whether there had been a deprivation; and third, whether the deprivation was arbitrary.
"Essential characteristics", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963286
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Essential characteristics"
2004 C L C 582
ABBAS KHAN and 11 others — Petitioners Versus HAFEEZ-UR-REHMAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2009 S C M R 29
UMAR DIN through L.Rs. — Appellants Versus Mst. SHAKEELA BIBI and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1992 M L D 1372
Mrs. SUNDESH RANI MEHTA and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1977 Karachi 397
PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus MUSTAFA R. C. C. PIPE WORKS, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: Ss. 31 & 32‑Award‑Clause in agreement deed lacking essential, characteristics of arbitration agreement, reference to Superintending Engineer and finality of his decision not only subjected to other provisions of agreement but also made further subject to powers delegated to him by Government under Code Rules and whether such powers actually delegated not known‑Words in agreement too vague and indefinite to have matter decided by Superintending Engineer Most important characteristic of award : Such must emanate from a judicial character‑Superintending Engineer not holding any inquiry or acting in quasi judicial manner‑No dispute and no submission of case to him, Superintending Engineer acting solely on basis of a letter` of Executive Engineer‑Officer, held, acted merely as a superior Officer in exercise of his own judgment and not as arbitrator, hence, his decision not an award so as to be barred from challenge in civil Courts.‑Award‑Arbitration.P L D 1977 Karachi 152
KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SIND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, EXCISE & TAXATION DEPARTMENT, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1969 Supreme Court 71
GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑ — Appellant Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD SABAR LAL‑ — Respondent
Court:P L D 1971 Lahore 567
Mst. BEGAN‑ — Appellant Versus Mst. BAI — ‑Respondent
Court:2007 P L C 528
ABDUL SALAM Versus Messrs PAKISTAN SYNTHETICS LIMITED
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission2001 M L D 39
MARS INCORPORATED — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING
Court: Karachi2001 P T D 129
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus MADURA DEVAKOTTAI TRANSPORTS (P.) LTD.
Court: 238 I T R 1003