Substantive evidence
Substantive evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
If court was satisfied that the substantive evidence was natural, reliable and trustworthy then supportive evidence would not be a legal requirement.
"Substantive evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963297
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Substantive evidence"
1978 S C M R 40
MUHAMMAD ASHIQ-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR alias BILLA AND AHOTHER — Respondents
Court: --- S. 302 read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 288 Murder-case transferred statement-Retrial-Trial Court giving reasons for not relying upon statements of resiling witnesses trans ferred under S. 288, L r. P. C.-Reasons given neither perverse nor whimsical or capricious-Nor such as could not be arrived at by any reasonable person-Revision even if admitted order of retrial at most possible but S. 288, Cr. P. C. having been omitted by Ordinance XVIII of 1971, previous statements of resiling witnesses, not to be treated as substantive evidence at trial-No likelihood of conviction ,misting in absence of any substantive evidence merely on basis of . Corroborative evidence ordering retrial, in circumstance, held, only an exercise in futility. Re-trial.P L D 1970 Supreme Court 72
MUHAMMAD AHMAD alias MAHANDA‑ — Appellant Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent
Court:1982 P Cr
ALLAH DITTA-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Lahore2005 Y L R 3357
ALI MUHAMMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1968 S C M R 1310
THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus KHAN BEG AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 (W
HAJI MUHAMMAD‑ — Appellant Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent
Court:P L D 1975 Supreme Court 179
FALAK SHER AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 302‑Murder case‑Sentence‑Sentences of death not confirm ed till date of amnesty declared by President of Republic‑Am nesty, held, not applicable to accused appellants in circumstances.1984 M L D 287
SHAHZADA AHMED SHAH — Petitioner Versus M.M.A.SIDDIQUI — Respondent
Court: KarachiP
BALOO‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent
Court:1973 P Cr
MEHRAJ DIN AND ANOTHER — Accused-Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore