Imposition of conditions
Imposition of conditions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner was accused under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, who was admitted to bail with a condition to surrender his passport and his name was placed on "Exit Control List"
Plea raised by petitioner was that no condition could be imposed in bail granting order
Validity
When bail was granted to petitioner, it was felt necessary by High Court to procure passport and to place his name on "Exit Control List"
Court while granting bail was duty bound to prescribe type of surety it needed for securing attendance of accused
Even a routine bail order contained certain conditions between the lines
Order of surrendering passport and placing name on "Exit Control List" was done as a practice and routine being followed in bail matter pertaining to NAB
High Court declined to interfere in bail granting order, there being illegality in the order
Courts were not required to pass mechanical orders and had to take into consideration the status of sureties, their validity as well as circumstances which would provide satisfaction to Court that order of concession of bail would not be misused
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
"Imposition of conditions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963315
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Imposition of conditions"
1990 S C M R 686
HABIB BANK LIMITED, CIRCLE OFFICE, MULTAN‑‑Petitioner Versus AL‑OAIM TRADERS and another‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1989 C L C 1633
AL QAIM TRADERS‑‑Petitioner Versus HABIB BANK Ltd.‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2011 C L D 1058
MERAJ AGRO, CHEMICAL (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN through Chief Executive — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE- Respondent
Court: Lahore2011 M L D 1249
MERAJ AGRO, CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 M L D 4174
Mst. NIAZ BIBI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1982S24
Present : Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ Versus Ch. SIKANDAR KHAN ETC.‑Respondents
Court: S. 13‑Eviction‑Imposition of condition for eviction‑Tenancy agreement covenanting for providing specified alternative accommoda tion to tenant in case landlord desires to reconstruct premises in dispute‑Held : None of provisions of S. 13 of Ordinance VI of 1959 empowers Rent Controller to make order of ejectment of tenant conditional on landlord's providing him with alternative accommoda tion immediately on eviction and prior to reconstruction of building.‑ Interpretation of statutes.1989 C L C 1535
Before Khalid Paul, J Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SHAH and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1989 M L D 171
MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus HOECHST PHARMACEUTICAL PAKISTAN (Pvt.) Ltd. and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2007 M L D 1807
MUHAMMAD ZAHEER — Petitioner Versus SHUMAILA ZAIB and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore