Home Maxims & Terms Statutory powers meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Statutory powers

Statutory powers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 690 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Statutory powersBalance, maintenance of

Where authorities fail to regulate their discretion by framing of rules, policy statements or precedents, it becomes mandatory for Court to intervene in order to maintain requisite balance for exercise of statutory power.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Statutory powers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963319

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Statutory powers"

SCMR 2018
Civil Petition No. 661-K of 2015, decided on 12th September, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1828

BOURBON MARITIME (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus m.v. SALAJ and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1997
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1703/M in Writ Petition No. 8015 of 1996, decided on 11th August, 1996.

P L D 1997 Lahore 15

MUHAMMAD ANWAR ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS BUTT, INSPECTOR/S.H.O.,

Court:
CLD 2010
2010-May-26

2010 C L D 1765

AF INDUSTRIES through Proprietor and 2 others — Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. KAR-277 of 1990, decided on 10th April, 1991.

1992 P L C 873

RESEARCH, KARACHI Versus WAOARUDDIN

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
SCMR 1968
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 167 of 1968, decided on 20th June 1968.

1968 S C M R 1333 (1)

REHMATULLAH‑Petitioner Versus NISNR AHMAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1987
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 228 of 1987, decided on 12th (Nay, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1482

KHAN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ISHTIAQ HUSSAIN‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑S. 18 as amended by Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance (Amendment) Act (V of 1986)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 24‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Value of suit for purpose of jurisdiction being beyond Rs. Fifty thousand, appeal was filed before High Court before promulgation of Ordinance V of 1986‑‑On promulgation of Ordinance VI of 1986 appeal was transferred by High Court to District Judge‑‑Application for re‑transfer of appeal to High Court dismissed‑‑Contention of petitioners that they had a vested right to have their appeal heard and decided by High Court and that amendment made by Act V of 1986 in West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance was not retrospective, repelled as per rule laid down by Supreme Court in 1987 S C M R 978‑‑Provisions of S . 24, C . P . C . , furthermore expressly empowered High Court of its own motion without notice to parties to transfer any appeal pending before it for disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to dispose of the same‑‑Petitioner could not claim vested right in derogation of statutory power of High Court under S.24, C.P.C.‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
PTD 2023
Civil Appeal No.24-Q of 2014 and Civil Appeal No. 26-Q of 2018, decided on 26th May, 2021.

2023 P T D 1617

Haji TOOTI and another Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2011
2011-March-3

PLD 2011 Karachi 293

Syed JEHANGIR ALI and others — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, HYDERABAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2023
Civil Appeal No.24-Q of 2014 and Civil Appeal No. 26-Q of 2018, decided on 26th May, 2021.

2023 S C M R 1980

Haji TOOTI and another — Appellants Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2023
2022-April-5

2023 M L D 323

INTERWORLD COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED through Authorized Representative — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman, PTA and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad