Home Maxims & Terms Safety measures meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Safety measures

Safety measures legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PCrLJN 125 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Rash or negligent act or omissionSafety measuresPrinciples

High Court observed that police check-posts should be set up at small distances besides the roads; surprise raids should be made on the running buses; licences of the drivers who are in the habit of rash driving should be cancelled and if the bus companies neglect the warning, so made their route permits should be discontinued; public should co-operate with the government for the enforcement of traffic laws; passengers should enforce the drivers not to exceed the speed limit, they should refuse to travel by the buses which did not observe traffic laws; complete periodical medical check up of the drivers should be undergone; errant drivers were not to be permitted to drive the vehicles; rules and regulations should be strictly followed by the licensing authorities to issue the same; use of mobile telephones should strictly be prohibited; examination of the vehicle should be undertaken by the competent authorities to provide a certificate to ply the same; overloading of passengers or of goods should strictly be controlled; to control the over speeding, speed breakers, rumble strips, road markings, traffic signs and roundabouts be made; speed mongering, monarchy and unconscious emotional drive should stringently be controlled by modern devices; amounts of fines in traffic laws infringement may relatively be enhanced.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Safety measures", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963350

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Safety measures"

CLC 2022
2021-June-4

2022 C L C 1181

M. NADEEM A. SHAIKH and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
SCMR 1981
Civil Review Petition No. 6-R of 1977, decided on 10th March; 1981.

1981 SCMR 608

Mst. BASHIRAN AND 4 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, P. W. RAILWAY

Court: ----S. 2 read with Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), S. 3 and North Western Railway, Way and Works Manual, 1928, para. 167-Fatal accident-Compensation-Fitter required by his superior authorities to fix sheets on roof of a newly constructed room but after performing such job his foot slipping while getting down by means of a ladder and worker dying as a result of bead injury-Award made in favour of deceased's defendants being not acceptable to them, their case being that a higher amount was payable under S. 2 of Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, and such claims having not been accepted by Courts below, Supreme Court on special leave holding superior officers of deceased having not been negligent within purview of S. 2 of Act XIII of 1855 in not providing safety measures to deceased Held, on review: Departmental interpretation of cl. (c) of para. 167 as to belts being not provided for climbing on ladder but being provided for climbing poles neither unreasonable nor unfair-No convincing reason given how deceased while climbing down ladder could have effectively used a lifeline for purposes of his personal safety till he reached floor--Petition for review dismissed in circumstances but Department advised to provide relief/grant to petitioners.-Compensation.
PLD 2020
2019-January-31

P L D 2020 Lahore 85

MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Appellant Versus CIVIL DEFENCE OFFICER, JHELUM and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
17th September 1976

P L D 1976 Supreme Court 748

Mst. BASHIRAN ETC.-Appellants Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, P. W. R. ETC.-Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 2024
2023-March-20

2024 P Cr

Jail Superintendent, District Jail Kotli and another — Appellants Versus Muhammad Riaz — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court AJ & K
SCMR 1989
Civil Petition No.7 of 1989, decided on 20th February, 1989.

1989SCMR1418

GHULAM SHABBIR‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT FOOD CONTROLLER and others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2020
2020-January-10

2020 M L D 1021

Syed SAMI AHMAD and another — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Sindh
MLD 2004
2003-August-26

2004 M L D 626

KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD — Appellant Versus AQEELA BANG and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2009
Criminal Bail Application No.941 of 2008, decided on 8th October, 2008.

2009 Y L R 914

MUHAMMAD YASEEN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1997
Suit No. 725 of 1988, decided on 22nd October, 1996.

1997 C L C 507

KARIM BUKSH ‑‑‑ Plaintiff Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

Court: Karachi