Home Maxims & Terms Recording of confession meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Recording of confession

Recording of confession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PCrLJN 244 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 164Recording of confessionProcedure

Magistrate was to follow the procedure that hand cuffs of accused be removed when produced for confession; all the police officers be turned out from court room; accused be informed that irrespective of the fact that he made a statement or not, he would not be given back to police who brought him; but would be remanded to judicial lockup and accused be then given a time to ponder over the matter, thereafter he be informed that he was not bound to make any statement and if he did so same could be used as evidence against him

Accused be put the questions firstly, that for how long had you been with police?; secondly, that had any pressure been brought to bear upon you to make the confession?; thirdly, that had you been threatened to make confession?; fourthly, that had any inducement been given to you?; fifthly, that as to why were you making confession?; lastly, that had you been maltreated by police?, after recording the accused's answers if Magistrate was satisfied as to the voluntariness of confession, he could then put such questions as given in printed form and then proceed to record the confession.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Recording of confession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963702

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Recording of confession"

PLD 1978
Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 54 of 1877, heard on 30th July 1977.

P L D 1978 Quetta 1

$HAU 'KAT SAEED-Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: -- S. 164 read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 21-Confession Delay-Relevancy-Rules of admissibility-Prescribe no limit regard ing time of detention preceding recording of confession-Mere fact of confession having been recorded after 24 hours of deten tion-Would not make confession inadmissible-Confession cannot be ruled out solely on ground of delay except by reference to other evidence attending confession-Every confession to be considered on its merits in light of surrounding facts and circumstances-Tooh v. State 1975 P Cr. L J 440 overruled.-Delay-Confession.
PLD 1956
Confirmation Case No. 14 of 1951, Criminal (jail) Appeal No. 132 of 1951, decided on 14th May 1951.

P L D 1956 Karachi 389

ABDUR RAHMAN‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 286-M of 2017, decided on 7th March, 2018.

2019 Y L R 318

GUL MAJID — Appellant Versus AKHTAR MOHAMMAD and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mangora Bench)
PCRLJ 2019
2019-January-22

2019 P Cr

ASMATULLAH KHAN — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Bannu Bench)
PCRLJ 1987
Criminal Appeals Nos. 54/L and 109/L of 1986, decided on 23rd October, 1986.

1987 P Cr

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
MLD 2002
Criminal Jail Appeal No.52 of 2000, decided on 8th April, 2002.

2002 M L D 1867

MITHAL and others ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2003
N/A

2003 P Cr

GANGOO RAM — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Bail Application No.42 of 1985, decided on 23rd January, 1985.

1986 P Cr

OMER KATCHI and others‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1999
1998-September-29

1999 M L D 2646

ALI AHMAD and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
YLR 2007
N/A

2007 Y L R 14

MUHAMMAD DILDAR alias BILLU — Appellant Versus THE STATE -Respondent

Court: Lahore