Recording of confession
Recording of confession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Magistrate was to follow the procedure that hand cuffs of accused be removed when produced for confession; all the police officers be turned out from court room; accused be informed that irrespective of the fact that he made a statement or not, he would not be given back to police who brought him; but would be remanded to judicial lockup and accused be then given a time to ponder over the matter, thereafter he be informed that he was not bound to make any statement and if he did so same could be used as evidence against him
Accused be put the questions firstly, that for how long had you been with police?; secondly, that had any pressure been brought to bear upon you to make the confession?; thirdly, that had you been threatened to make confession?; fourthly, that had any inducement been given to you?; fifthly, that as to why were you making confession?; lastly, that had you been maltreated by police?, after recording the accused's answers if Magistrate was satisfied as to the voluntariness of confession, he could then put such questions as given in printed form and then proceed to record the confession.
"Recording of confession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963702
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Recording of confession"
P L D 1978 Quetta 1
$HAU 'KAT SAEED-Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: -- S. 164 read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 21-Confession Delay-Relevancy-Rules of admissibility-Prescribe no limit regard ing time of detention preceding recording of confession-Mere fact of confession having been recorded after 24 hours of deten tion-Would not make confession inadmissible-Confession cannot be ruled out solely on ground of delay except by reference to other evidence attending confession-Every confession to be considered on its merits in light of surrounding facts and circumstances-Tooh v. State 1975 P Cr. L J 440 overruled.-Delay-Confession.P L D 1956 Karachi 389
ABDUR RAHMAN‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court:2019 Y L R 318
GUL MAJID — Appellant Versus AKHTAR MOHAMMAD and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Mangora Bench)2019 P Cr
ASMATULLAH KHAN — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Bannu Bench)1987 P Cr
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court2002 M L D 1867
MITHAL and others ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1986 P Cr
OMER KATCHI and others‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1999 M L D 2646
ALI AHMAD and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court2007 Y L R 14
MUHAMMAD DILDAR alias BILLU — Appellant Versus THE STATE -Respondent
Court: Lahore