Appointment by absorption
Appointment by absorption legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellant was appointed as Agricultural Officer (BPS-17) by initial recruitment in the Balochistan Agricultural and Cooperative Department, and then absorbed against the post of Research Officer (BPS-17) in the Planning and Development Department without affecting the seniority of the Research Officers already working in the department
Plea on behalf of appellant that his case was not covered by the dicta rendered in the cases of Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016), therefore, the notification repatriating him to his parent department could not hold the field; held, that the relevant service rules of the Provincial Planning and Development Department provided that vacancy of Research Officer was to be filled by initial recruitment, thus, there was no scope for filling such vacancy by promotion, transfer, absorption or by any other method which was not provided by the relevant law and rules
Appointment of appellant by absorption being hit by the judgments rendered in the cases of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016) could not be maintained
Appellant had thus rightly been repatriated to his parent department
Review petition was dismissed accordingly.
Appellant was appointed as Agricultural Officer (BPS-17) by initial recruitment in the Balochistan Agricultural and Cooperative Department, and then absorbed against the post of Research Officer (BPS-17) in the Planning and Development Department without affecting the seniority of the Research Officers already working in the department
Plea on behalf of appellant that his case was not covered by the dicta rendered in the cases of Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016), therefore, the notification repatriating him to his parent department could not hold the field; held, that the relevant service rules of the Provincial Planning and Development Department provided that vacancy of Research Officer was to be filled by initial recruitment, thus, there was no scope for filling such vacancy by promotion, transfer, absorption or by any other method which was not provided by the relevant law and rules
Appointment of appellant by absorption being hit by the judgments rendered in the cases of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl.O.P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016) could not be maintained
Appellant had thus rightly been repatriated to his parent department
Review petition was dismissed accordingly.
Appointment by transfer had been provided in the said Regulations but that could not be stretched to civil servants of the Federal or Provincial Government
Appellants, who completed their normal and even extended tenure of deputation in the (Gwadar) Development Authority ("the Authority"), had to go back to their parent department
Absorption of the appellants in the 'Authority' being against the law and rules was to be set at naught
Notification repatriating the appellants to their parent departments was therefore unexceptional
Supreme Court treating the appeal as review and hearing the same as such, dismissed the petition accordingly.
"Appointment by absorption", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963831
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appointment by absorption"
2018 P L C (C
RAFIQ AHMED and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 S C M R 48
RAFIQ AHMED and others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2017 S C M R 2051
SUDHIR AHMED and others — Appellants Versus The SPEAKER, BALOCHISTAN PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD JAMEEL KHAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division,
Court: Federal Service TribunalP L D 1982 Supreme Court 104
Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain, Karam Elahee Chauhan and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W. F. P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Court: ...‑.‑ S. 26 read with West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964, r. 10 as amended & r. 8‑Absorption of Lawyer Magistrates Seniority‑Rider in r. 10 as to their seniority having not in any case to be earlier than their respective dates of appointment as Lawyer Magis trates‑Held : Refers to date or dates on which such persons were to be appointed in form of absorption as Lawyer Magistrates onward from and in implementation of r. 10 and not to their date of initial periodic induction in service‑Grant of seniority to such periodic employees over those having in meantime come into service on regular basis through competitive examination by Public Service Commission Not justified.‑Civil services.1993 S C M 9 798
Maj. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD MATLUB KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through
Court: Supreme Court pf Pakistan1991 P L C (C
TAJUDDIN KHAN SHERWANI and another Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2001 P L C (C
Agha ALTAF NABI Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others
Court: Sindh Service Tribunal1990 S C M R 1216
FARMAN ALI and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and another‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court2021 P L C (C
FAYYAZ HUSSAIN and another Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan