Home Maxims & Terms Appointment by absorption meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Appointment by absorption

Appointment by absorption legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 SCMR 54 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
R. 7Appointment by absorptionRepatriation to parent department

Appellant was appointed as Agricultural Officer (BPS-17) by initial recruitment in the Balochistan Agricultural and Cooperative Department, and then absorbed against the post of Research Officer (BPS-17) in the Planning and Development Department without affecting the seniority of the Research Officers already working in the department

Plea on behalf of appellant that his case was not covered by the dicta rendered in the cases of Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016), therefore, the notification repatriating him to his parent department could not hold the field; held, that the relevant service rules of the Provincial Planning and Development Department provided that vacancy of Research Officer was to be filled by initial recruitment, thus, there was no scope for filling such vacancy by promotion, transfer, absorption or by any other method which was not provided by the relevant law and rules

Appointment of appellant by absorption being hit by the judgments rendered in the cases of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016) could not be maintained

Appellant had thus rightly been repatriated to his parent department

Review petition was dismissed accordingly.

2018 PLC(CS) 564 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
R. 7Appointment by absorptionRepatriation to parent department

Appellant was appointed as Agricultural Officer (BPS-17) by initial recruitment in the Balochistan Agricultural and Cooperative Department, and then absorbed against the post of Research Officer (BPS-17) in the Planning and Development Department without affecting the seniority of the Research Officers already working in the department

Plea on behalf of appellant that his case was not covered by the dicta rendered in the cases of Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl. O. P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016), therefore, the notification repatriating him to his parent department could not hold the field; held, that the relevant service rules of the Provincial Planning and Development Department provided that vacancy of Research Officer was to be filled by initial recruitment, thus, there was no scope for filling such vacancy by promotion, transfer, absorption or by any other method which was not provided by the relevant law and rules

Appointment of appellant by absorption being hit by the judgments rendered in the cases of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456) and Muzaffar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan (Crl.O.P. No.31 of 2016 decided on 10.05.2016) could not be maintained

Appellant had thus rightly been repatriated to his parent department

Review petition was dismissed accordingly.

2018 PLC(CS) 362 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Paras. 4.11, 4.24 & 4.25Appointment by absorptionLegalityAppointment by absorption figured nowhere in the Gwadar Development Authority Employees (Service) Regulations, 2006

Appointment by transfer had been provided in the said Regulations but that could not be stretched to civil servants of the Federal or Provincial Government

Appellants, who completed their normal and even extended tenure of deputation in the (Gwadar) Development Authority ("the Authority"), had to go back to their parent department

Absorption of the appellants in the 'Authority' being against the law and rules was to be set at naught

Notification repatriating the appellants to their parent departments was therefore unexceptional

Supreme Court treating the appeal as review and hearing the same as such, dismissed the petition accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Appointment by absorption", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963831

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appointment by absorption"

PLC(CS) 2018
Civil Appeal No. 587 of 2017 and C.M.A. No. 3198 of 2017, decided on 29th September, 2017.

2018 P L C (C

RAFIQ AHMED and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2018
Civil Appeal No. 587 of 2017 and C.M.A. No. 3198 of 2017, decided on 29th September, 2017.

2018 S C M R 48

RAFIQ AHMED and others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2017
Civil Appeals Nos. 704 to 706, 708, 711 and 778 of 2017, decided on 25th September, 2017.

2017 S C M R 2051

SUDHIR AHMED and others — Appellants Versus The SPEAKER, BALOCHISTAN PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1993
Appeal No. 143(R) of 1990, decided on 15th June, 1991.

1993 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL KHAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division,

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLD 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 40‑P of 1980, decided on 17th November, 1981.

P L D 1982 Supreme Court 104

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain, Karam Elahee Chauhan and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W. F. P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Court: ...‑.‑ S. 26 read with West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964, r. 10 as amended & r. 8‑Absorption of Lawyer Magistrates Seniority‑Rider in r. 10 as to their seniority having not in any case to be earlier than their respective dates of appointment as Lawyer Magis trates‑Held : Refers to date or dates on which such persons were to be appointed in form of absorption as Lawyer Magistrates onward from and in implementation of r. 10 and not to their date of initial periodic induction in service‑Grant of seniority to such periodic employees over those having in meantime come into service on regular basis through competitive examination by Public Service Commission Not justified.‑Civil services.
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeals Nos. 258 and 259 of 1991, decided on 22nd December, 1992.

1993 S C M 9 798

Maj. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD MATLUB KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through

Court: Supreme Court pf Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1991
Appeals Nos. 373(R) of 1980 and 110(R) of 1988, decided on 15th' November, 1990.

1991 P L C (C

TAJUDDIN KHAN SHERWANI and another Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 2001
Appeal No. 93 of 1997, decided on 12th January, 1999.

2001 P L C (C

Agha ALTAF NABI Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others

Court: Sindh Service Tribunal
SCMR 1990
N/A

1990 S C M R 1216

FARMAN ALI and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and another‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2021
Civil Petitions Nos. 4041 and 4077 of 2019, decided on 17th August, 2020.

2021 P L C (C

FAYYAZ HUSSAIN and another Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan