Home Maxims & Terms Replacement of arbitrator meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Replacement of arbitrator

Replacement of arbitrator legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 PLD 1 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 11, 12 & 20ArbitrationReplacement of arbitratorPrincipleMatter was referred to arbitral tribunal comprising of two members appointed with consent of parties

Trial Court, on application under Ss.11 & 12 of Arbitration Act, 1940, removed arbitral tribunal and appointed a sole arbitrator

Validity

Where an arbitrator appointed by a party was removed under S. 11 of Arbitration Act, 1940, court was not bound to ask that party whose nominee had been removed to nominate another person to replace removed arbitrator

Court was also not bound to appoint nominee of party to replace removed arbitrator

Court could ask the party whose nominee had been removed to suggest names of suitable persons so as to enable the court to fill up vacancy caused by order of removal of an arbitrator

Court had to make the final choice for appointment of arbitrator

Court in appointing a sole arbitrator after removing two member arbitral tribunal, was not bound to appoint a retired Judge of the Supreme Court at instance of party

No infirmity existed in order of the Trial Court appointing sole arbitrator and fixing his fee which both parties to dispute were bound to pay

Two membered arbitral tribunal was correctly removed by Trial Court and sole arbitrator was correctly appointed in exercise of powers conferred under S.12(2)(a) of Arbitration Act, 1940

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Replacement of arbitrator", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963834

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Replacement of arbitrator"

PLD 2018
2017-August-16

P L D 2018 Islamabad 1

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through D.G. National Training Bureau — Petitioner Versus Messrs JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT) Ltd. — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 2024
2024-January-6

2024 C L C 2021

EMPLOYEES OLD AGE BENEFIT INSTITUTION through Director Law EOBI — Appellant Versus Messrs MUGHALS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive Officer and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1966
Writ Petitions Nos. 273 and 274 of 1964, decided on 12th February 1965.

P L D 1966 Dacca 133

M. M. SIDDIQUE & SONS‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER — Respondents

Court:
PLD 2013
2013-January-18

P L D 2013 Sindh 254

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI — Plaintiff Versus Messrs ABDULLAH SUGAR MILLS LIMITED (DEPALPUR) and others — Defendants

Court: High Court
MLD 1984
Writ Petition No. 1008 of 1967, decided on 3rd June, 1984.

1984 M L D 338

Messrs MIAN MUHAMMAD ALLAH BAKHSH Ltd. — Petitioner Versus The REVENUE OFFICER (EXECUTIVE ENGINEER),

Court: Karachi
CLC 2003
N/A

2003 C L C 419

S.M.I. BROTHERS through Managing Partner — Appellant Versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MURREE through Administrator — -Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2020
2019-December-9

2020 C L C 760

The IMPERIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Chief Financial Officer — Petitioner Versus Messrs ZHONGXING TELECOM PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Chief Executive and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 1970
Suit No. 358 of 1969, decided on 24th February 1970.

P L D 1970 Karachi 490

STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI‑Plaintiff Versus MESSRS NAQSON AND 2 OTHERS ‑Defendants

Court:
MLD 2000
1999-October-12

2000 M L D 641

Messrs MANZOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Through Director — Plaintiff Versus NICHIMEN CORPORATION and 2 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 2006
N/A

P L D 2006 Lahore 443

DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court