Replacement of arbitrator
Replacement of arbitrator legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial Court, on application under Ss.11 & 12 of Arbitration Act, 1940, removed arbitral tribunal and appointed a sole arbitrator
Validity
Where an arbitrator appointed by a party was removed under S. 11 of Arbitration Act, 1940, court was not bound to ask that party whose nominee had been removed to nominate another person to replace removed arbitrator
Court was also not bound to appoint nominee of party to replace removed arbitrator
Court could ask the party whose nominee had been removed to suggest names of suitable persons so as to enable the court to fill up vacancy caused by order of removal of an arbitrator
Court had to make the final choice for appointment of arbitrator
Court in appointing a sole arbitrator after removing two member arbitral tribunal, was not bound to appoint a retired Judge of the Supreme Court at instance of party
No infirmity existed in order of the Trial Court appointing sole arbitrator and fixing his fee which both parties to dispute were bound to pay
Two membered arbitral tribunal was correctly removed by Trial Court and sole arbitrator was correctly appointed in exercise of powers conferred under S.12(2)(a) of Arbitration Act, 1940
Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
"Replacement of arbitrator", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963834
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Replacement of arbitrator"
P L D 2018 Islamabad 1
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through D.G. National Training Bureau — Petitioner Versus Messrs JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT) Ltd. — Respondent
Court: High Court2024 C L C 2021
EMPLOYEES OLD AGE BENEFIT INSTITUTION through Director Law EOBI — Appellant Versus Messrs MUGHALS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive Officer and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1966 Dacca 133
M. M. SIDDIQUE & SONS‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court:P L D 2013 Sindh 254
TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI — Plaintiff Versus Messrs ABDULLAH SUGAR MILLS LIMITED (DEPALPUR) and others — Defendants
Court: High Court1984 M L D 338
Messrs MIAN MUHAMMAD ALLAH BAKHSH Ltd. — Petitioner Versus The REVENUE OFFICER (EXECUTIVE ENGINEER),
Court: Karachi2003 C L C 419
S.M.I. BROTHERS through Managing Partner — Appellant Versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MURREE through Administrator — -Respondent
Court: Lahore2020 C L C 760
The IMPERIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Chief Financial Officer — Petitioner Versus Messrs ZHONGXING TELECOM PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Chief Executive and 2 others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 1970 Karachi 490
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI‑Plaintiff Versus MESSRS NAQSON AND 2 OTHERS ‑Defendants
Court:2000 M L D 641
Messrs MANZOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Through Director — Plaintiff Versus NICHIMEN CORPORATION and 2 others — Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 2006 Lahore 443
DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court