Home Maxims & Terms Time bound proceedings meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Time bound proceedings

Time bound proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 PLD 20 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Time bound proceedingsScope

Where time is prescribed to conclude proceedings and no consequence is provided for failure to do so, such time period is taken as directory and not mandatory.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Time bound proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963837

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Time bound proceedings"

SCMR 2025
Civil Petition No. 110 of 2023 and C.M.A. No. 5968 of 2025, decided on 28th August, 2025.

2025 S C M R 1957

Messrs COMMANDER AGRO (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Petitioner Versus CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH-I, LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2026
N/A

2026 P T D 34

Messrs FATIMA FERTILIZER COMPANY Versus CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 2011
N/A

2011 Y L R 2429

Messrs MEERUB TRAVEL (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS through Secretary and 2'others —

Court: Lahore
PLD 2018
2017-June-22

P L D 2018 Islamabad 20

LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMIED (LESCO) and others — Petitioners Versus NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER REGULATORY AUTHORITY and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1972
29th dune 1970

P L D 1972 Karachi 622

JALAL DIN‑Applicant Versus CHIRAGH DIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Opponents

Court: High Court
CLC 2001
Writ Petition No. 832 of 1999, decided on 16th March, 2001.

2001 C L C 1847

KHAISTA KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.‑W.F.P., PESHAWAR and 4

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1966
Revision No. 1986 of 1963‑64, decided on 26th January 1966.

P L D 1966 W

TUFAIL MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 2025
C.A. No. 636-L of 2012 in C.P.L.A. No. 1637-L of 2010, decided on 10th July, 2025.

2025 S C M R 2095

MUHAMMAD SADIQ (deceased) through L.Rs. — Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TOBA TEK SINGH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1989
Civil Appeal No.283 of 1988, decided on 16th-August, 1988.

1989 M L D 2457

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH — Appellant Versus Messrs DOABA COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS Ltd., JALANDHAR-Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLD 1968
Letters Patent Appeal No. 130 of 1967, decided on 13th March 1967.

P L D 1968 Lahore 20

MEHRAJ DIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD YASIN AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: The judgment sets out manifold reasons for the above opinion.