Home Maxims & Terms Subordinate legislation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Subordinate legislation

Subordinate legislation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLC(CS) 253 SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationDelegation of powersScopeAny act or subordinate legislation in contravention of the Constitution is ultra vires the fundamental law

Similarly, where the power to enact sub-statutory legislation is vested in any authority, the same can only be exercised within the four corners of the statute, in a manner consistent with the provisions of the statute.

2026 CLC 777 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
PreambleSindh Coal Act, 2012 (XXVIII of 2013), S.20Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionNotices issued under Rules framed without lawful approval, challenge toSubordinate legislationCabinet approvalMandatory requirementNon-compliance, effect ofEx post facto approvalValidity and scope

Briefly, the petitioners (mining companies) filed the present constitutional petition challenging the validity of the Sindh Coal Mines Rules, 2016 framed under the Sindh Coal Act, 2012, on the ground that the Rules were promulgated without prior approval of the Cabinet and thereafter notices were issued to them under the said Rules requiring compliance in respect of various matters; during proceedings, it was acknowledged that Cabinet approval had not been obtained at the time of framing of the Rules but was subsequently granted, and the petitioners sought relief against the impugned notices issued under the said Rules

Held: Rules framed without prior approval of the cabinet were of no effect

High Court set aside the impugned notices on the ground that the same were anchored in the rules which were not framed in accordance with the requirement of ratio laid down by the Supreme Court

Moreover, no action in terms of the said rules were to be taken unless the matter was reconsidered by the cabinet and the fresh rules were framed

Constitutional petition was disposed of, in circumstances.

2025 CLC 750 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationDelegation of powersScope

Delegator cannot denude itself of its authority either to revoke the delegation or to exercise its power as a parent authority, however, only in cases where the delegatee has already decided the matter, the delegator cannot revisit the decision of the delegate unless an express power is conferred in this regard.

2025 CLC 750 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationDelegation of powersScope

Delegator cannot denude itself of its authority either to revoke the delegation or to exercise its power as a parent authority, however, only in cases where the delegatee has already decided the matter, the delegator cannot revisit the decision of the delegate unless an express power is conferred in this regard.

2023 PLD 278 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationRules made under a statuteScope

Concept of subordinate legislation by way of rules is to toe the object of the main statute and not to collide with scheme of law

Subordinate rules can only function in conformity with the main statue in order to give effect to the statutory provisions.

2022 PTD 222 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationScopeRules and regulations are subordinate legislation which cannot go beyond the ambit and scope of parent statute

Mere fact that power has been conferred on the Authority to make rules and regulations does not authorize framing of delegated legislation that is inconsistent with or repugnant to parent Act

Levy of a charge, which falls within an essential legislative function cannot be delegated.

2022 PLC(CS) 1554 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationScope

Rules or progency of a statute which are made by the competent authority in exercise of its delegated legislation are confined and limited to the law under which they are framed.

2018 PLD 468 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislation

Such legislation had to be interpreted in a way which conformed to and stayed within the parameters of the parent statute.

2018 PLD 20 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislationVires

Subordinate legislation that runs contrary to statute, falsifies very object of parent law or creates hurdles in achievement of purpose of the principle statute has to be declared illegal and without lawful effect.

2018 PTD 2212 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislation

Rules/notifications being subordinate legislation were subservient to the parent statute and issuance of any instrument/notification under delegated authority was aimed to fulfill and advance the aim of the parent statue and could not nullify express provisions of the parent statute/Act.

2018 PTD 2154 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Subordinate legislation

Rules framed under a statute could not enlarge the scope of the parent statute; more particularly when such parent statute was penal in nature or created liability.

2018 PTD 378 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 13, 95, 219, 223 & Schedule-IIICustoms Rules, 2001, Rr. 237 to 263Subordinate legislationScopePetitioners were owners of licensed bonded warehouses

Grievance of petitioners was that only customs officials of Manufacturing Bond Control Office were vested with powers for verification, examination and assessment of goods which were to be exported as per terms and conditions of license

Validity

Matter related to exports, warehousing and examination etc. of exported goods was governed under Schedule-III of Customs Act, 1969

Policy regarding such matters could only be framed through rules under S.219 of Customs Act, 1969 and not through S.223 of Customs Act, 1969

High Court declared letter in question to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect

Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Subordinate legislation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963943

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Subordinate legislation"

PLD 2014
2012-November-28

P L D 2014 Lahore 163

Haji SIKANDAR — Appellant Versus HOME SECRETARY and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 155 of 1976. decided on 3rd May 1977.

P L D 1978 Lahore 468

MESSRS M. AFZAL & SONS AND 2 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD THROUGH SECRETARY, FINANCE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: -- S. 19 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Art. 77 and General Clauses Act (X of 1897). S. 21-Imposition of tax or duty Legislative power of Parliament Cannot be delegated to a subordinate authority empowering it to levy a tax or duty-Power of allowing exemption can, however, be delegated to such authority--Difference between "taxability or liability" and its "pay ability"-Recall of notification allowing exemption in respect of duty previously imposed by Legislature-Held, would not amount to re-imposition of a tax Notification allowing exemption creates a vested right which cannot be taken away by a subordinate legislation.-Delegation of powers.
CLC 1990
Civil Revision No. 23 of 1984, decided on 12th November, 1989.

1990 C L C 171

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHAN and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 2016
2016-February-3

P L D 2016 Lahore 237

PUNJAB HEALTHCARE COMMISSION — Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMED CH. and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2006
I.T.A. No.379/LB of 1999, decided on 15th October, 2005.

2006 P T D 1626

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND WEALTH TAX, GUJRANWALA Versus Messrs MUGHAL MECHANISMS (PVT.) LTD., GUJRANWALA

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2023
N/A

2023 P L C (C

ANAM BIBI Versus SECRETARY, PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, LAHORE and 6 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1996
Writ Petition No. (Nil) of 1996, decided on 18th June, 1996.

1996 C L C 1842

SHUJAH HAIDER ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AZAD J&K and 8 other‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
PTD 2013
S.T.A. No.1010/LB of 2012, decided on 19th October, 2012.

2013 P T D (Trib

Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE Versus C.I.R., ZONE-II, L.T.U., LAHORE

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PTD 2005
S.T.As. Nos. 224 and 225 of 2002, decided on 5th July, 2004.

2005 P T D 2436

CRESCENT RE-ROLLING MILLS, LAHORE Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC 2024
Constitutional Petition No.D-3853 and C.M.A. No.16813 of 2022, decided on 23rd June, 2022.

2024 P L C 25

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. through Authorized Officer Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development and Overseas Pakistan and 4 others

Court: Sindh High Court