Disputed Electricity bill
Disputed Electricity bill legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Complainant did not default in paying any monthly electricity bill but he had disputed incorrect reading recorded in the bill
Plea raised by authorities was that jurisdiction of Consumer Court was barred-Validity
Disputed electricity bill did not commensurate with actual electricity consumed by complainant
Such discrepancy was proved from documentary evidence produced during trial
Consumer Court though was actually bound to determine subject matter of complaint in summary manner but still a complete opportunity of hearing was given to both parties to settle their controversy one for all
High Court declined to interfere in the matter as Consumer Court had rightly allowed complaint by giving sound reasons after considering each and every aspect of the matter
Appeal against order was dismissed in circumstances.
"Disputed Electricity bill", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124963952
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disputed Electricity bill"
2025 C L D 181
AJMAL — Appellant Versus S.D.O, PESCO SUB-DIVISION, NOWSHERA CANTT-01 and 3 others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2018 Peshawar 26
EXN PESCO, SUB-DIVISION-II and another — Appellant Versus SHER AFZAL KHAN — Respondent
Court: High Court2003 C L C 1574
WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairmanand 2 others — Petitioners Versus Mian SHAUKAT HAYAT — Respondent
Court: Lahore2007 Y L R 1854
QUALITY STEEL WORKS LTD. — Plaintiff Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION-Defendant
Court: Karachi1999 C L C 492
through Chairman and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs KASHMIR STEEL FURNACE alias T. I. STEEL FURNACE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2017 Lahore 769
MEPCO and others — Petitioners Versus ADVISORY BOARD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2018 Y L R Note 258
Messrs SILVER FLOUR MILLS through Partner — Plaintiff Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED through
Court: Sindh2023 Y L R 302
PESCO through Chief Executive PESCO and others — Petitioners Versus MOHIB ULLAH KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (D.I. Khan Bench)2004 S C M R 1679
COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD., MULTAN through, Factory Manager — Petitioner Versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN ELECTRICITY POWER COMPANY LTD. (MEPCO), MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1987 M L D 2911
WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Syed FAQIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Respondent
Court: Lahore