Doctrine of privacy
Doctrine of privacy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Question before Banking Court was whether communication vide letter of the Bank to Federal Investigation Agency seeking action against defendant for being a defaulter constituted a violation of interim order of Banking Court whereby said Bank was restrained from projecting defendant as defaulter to the public
Held, that private and privileged communication between a Financial Institution/Bank and Government institution was neither a public announcement, was not intended for public consumption of people-at-large; nor was aimed to be produced and broadcasted to the general public, and thereby remaining a privileged and private communication, the same was protected by doctrine of privacy.
"Doctrine of privacy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124970229
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Doctrine of privacy"
2019 C L D 352
MCB BANK LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus EMADUL HASSAN — Defendant
Court: Sindh2019 S C M R 1460
TOM LE — Appellant Versus HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Canada*2009 C L D 1133
Mrs. RIFFAT SARAJ through Special Attorney — Appellant Versus EYE TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. through Director/Chairperson and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2021 C L C 204
GHULAM MUSTAFA — Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)P L D 2026 Lahore 395
VISHAL AHMAD SHAKIR — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2004 C L D 1680
M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑ ‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2010 Y L R 1647
Flt. Lt. (Dr) SHARIQ SAEED — Plaintiff Versus MANSOOB ALI KHAN and 5 others — Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1982 Karachi 425
MOHAMMAD MUNIR‑Plaintiff Versus AHMAD ALLY MEMON AND 2 others‑Defendants
Court: ‑‑ Read with Collector Karachi's Circular dated 29‑7‑1938 issued to Architects‑ Vires of Circular‑Circular neither gazetted nor shown to have been framed under any delegated authority, held, not a statutory rule.‑Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1999 Karachi 30
Mst. ABIDA AMIN — Plaintiff Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN and another- Defendants
Court: High CourtP L D 2007 Supreme Court 472
JAWAD MIR MUHAMMADI and others — Appellants Versus HAROON MIRZA and others — Respondents
Court: High Court