Home Maxims & Terms Employment Injury meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Employment Injury

Employment Injury legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 PLC 743 LABOUR-APPELLANT-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Words "accident" and "employment injury"

Meanings.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Employment Injury", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/12506

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Employment Injury"

PLC 1988
Case No.SS(C & B) IX (63)/87/4106, decided on 15th February, 1987.

1988 P L C 548

Messrs CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LTD., JARANWALA Versus DIRECTOR, SOCIAL SECURITY, FAISALABAD and another

Court: Social Security Commissioner Punjab
PLC 1990
Appeal No. KB‑1 of 1989/Pb., decided on 5th April, 1989.

1990 P L C 743

HABIB JUTE MILLS LIMITED Versus GHULAM HUSSAIN

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC 1983
First Appeal against Order No. 215 of 1977, decided on 17th January, 1983.

1983 P L C 390

PUNJAB SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, MAZDOOR UNION, SARGODHA TEXTILE MILLS AND ANOTHER

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC 1987
Constitutional Petition No.S-137 of 1983, decided on 20th November, 1984.

1987 P L C 536

Messrs H.NIZAM & SONS Versus COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION and another

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC 1978
M. A. No. 59 of 1976, decided on 4th July 1977.

1978 P L C 119

INSTITUTION, KARACHI Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER

Court: Karachi
PLD 1977
M. A. No. 59 of 1976, decided on 4th July 1977.

AGAIN EDIT

INSTITUTION, KARACHI‑App~liant Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ S. 64‑Object and scope of Ordinance‑Appeal, limitation as to szope of.‑Appeal (civil).
PLD 1976
Revision Application No. 162 of 1972, decided on 20th November 1972.

P L D 1976 Karachi 1228

SUNSHINE DIARIES LTD.‑Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑ Ss. 20, 57, 61 & 74‑Contribution payable by employer‑Civil Court, jurisdiction 4‑Ordinance not only makes employers liable to pay contribution under S. 22 but also provides special forum for determination of questions relating to payment of contribution and other matters referred to in S. 57‑Social Security Court, in circum stances, alone, held, given jurisdiction in such matters and jurisdic tion of civil Courts excluded by necessary implication‑Fact that jurisdiction of civil Courts in respect of contributions has not been specifically barred as in respect of claims for employment injury under S. 74 of no avail‑Creation of special forum alone bars jurisdiction of civil Courts‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 9. Jurisdiction.
PLC 1976
Appeal No. LHR-310 of 1976/Pb., decided on 11th October 1976.

1976 P L C 905

MUHAMMAD AMIN Versus PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC 1991
Constitutional Petition No. S‑27 of 1989, decided on 22nd May, 1990.

1991 P L C 479

UNITED WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT and another

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC 1977
Revision Application No. 162 of 1972, decided on 20th November 1972.

1977 P L C 145

SUNSHINE DIARIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER. SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION AND OTHERS

Court: Karachi