Citizenship
Citizenship legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Citizenship", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/12540
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Citizenship"
P L D 2021 Islamabad 187
Mst. SAMINA NAZ and others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2021 Islamabad 305
Hafiz HAMDULLAH SABOOR — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2025 M L D 1315
Saeed Zahir Zada — Petitioner Versus Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Interior and another — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2018 C L C 1588
SAEED ABDI MAHMUD — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL DATABASE REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2002 Lahore 521
UMAR AHMAD GHUMMAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: In order to ascertain the true meaning of the Legislature it is necessary to ascertain the circumstances with reference to which the words were used and what was the object appearing from those circumstances which the Legislature had in view.P L D 1962 Dacca 349
HSE YUNG HSIEH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1998 Lahore 59
SHARIFAN and 6 others — Petitioners Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN trough Secretary, Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control, Interior Division, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1971 Supreme Court 179
ADVOCATE-GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA-Appellant Versus BENOY BHUSAN MAJUMDAR AND 3 OTHERS Respondents
Court:P L D 1983 Quetta 20
ABDUL HAFIZ KHAN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KHUZDAR AND 4 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 23 read with Pakistan Citizenship Rules, 1952-Vires of RulesNo provision in Act itself existing for cancellation of Citizenship Certificate, any rule framed in such regard, empowering Central Government or any other authority, to cancel same, held, would be a rule outside scope of S. 23 of Act 11 of 1951 and, therefore, illegal and ultra vires.-Vires of statutes.P L D 2019 Supreme Court 201
Suo Motu Case No.8 of 2018 regarding dua Nationality of Parliamentarians and Civil Misc. Application No.649-L of 2018 impleadment application by Shahzad Ali Khan in Suo Motu Case No.8 of 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan