Rules, Vires of
Rules, Vires of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Where a Rule had the effect of being an unreasonable restriction, it could be struck down.
Rules may be declared ultra vires if the same are not made, sanctioned, published in the manner prescribed by the enactment, repugnant to it, uncertain or unreasonable, bad faith, misconstruction of enabling Act, failure to comply with the conditions prescribed under the enactment and violation of the object and reasons of the enactment.
Rules may be declared ultra vires if the same are not made, sanctioned, published in the manner prescribed by the enactment, repugnant to it, uncertain or unreasonable, bad faith, misconstruction of enabling Act, failure to comply with the conditions prescribed under the enactment and violation of the object and reasons of the enactment.
Mere unreasonableness would not be enough to strike down an otherwise valid rule but something more must coexist to bring about such a result.
"Rules, Vires of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/12860
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Rules, Vires of"
P L D 2023 Peshawar 187
MUDASSAR WAKEEL and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1988 S C M R 74
ASHFAQ KHALID and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF and 9 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2022 P T D 1444
Messrs AL-TARIQ CONSTRUCTORS (PRIVATE) LIMITED through authorized Officer Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chairman, Sindh Revenue Board and 2 others
Court: Sindh High Court2000 Y L R 1234
Chief Executive‑‑‑Petitioner Versus APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT/
Court: Lahore2023 S C M R 774
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture Department, Lahore — Petitioner Versus SALEEM IJAZ and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2019 S C M R 1132
MOHAMMAD IMRAN and others — Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretaryand others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1983 Karachi 324
Miss SAMINA NIGHAT-Petitioner Versus P. R. C. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: Residence Rules not statutory rules but administrative instructions for guidance of authorities concerned for purpose of determining eligibility of candidates applying for seats in Medical Colleges in conformity with quota allocated by prospectus of colleges-Such rules issued in exercise of executive authority vested in Government to frame policy-Permanent Residence Certificate Rules, held, still holding field.Educational institution.P L D 1985 Quetta 167
SARDAR KHAN-Petitioner Versus Haji ABDUL GHAFFAR AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 21 (2)-Baluchistan Local Government (Elections) Rules, 1983, rr. 18 & 70-Words 'any Court' used in subsection (2) of S. 21 of Ordinance would not cover an Election Tribunal provided for in Ordinance read with Rules.-Interpretation of statutes.2026 P L C (C
Syed SAAD ALI and another Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2026 S C M R 22
Syed SAAD ALI and another — Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan