Regulations of Convention of Universal Postal Union
Regulations of Convention of Universal Postal Union legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Suit having been decreed against Government of Pakistan and concerned insurance company they had chosen not to file appeal
Appeal filed by a department of Government wherein Government of Pakistan and insurance company were cited as respondents alongnvith plaintiff in whose favour decree had been granted, same was not competent being liable to be dismissed.
"Regulations of Convention of Universal Postal Union", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13004
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Regulations of Convention of Universal Postal Union"
1991CLC1601
through Assistant Postmaster General (Inv.) ‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs PAK BURMA TRADERS, KARACHI and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2017 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and another Versus CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and 4 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 2017 Lahore 406
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and another — Petitioners Versus CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1981 Supreme Court 377
A. M. QURESHI‑Appellant Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS AND ANOTHER‑
Court:1994 S C M R 1569
TEXAS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GREGORY LEE JOHNSON‑‑‑Respondent
Court: U.S. Supreme CourtP L D 2021 Supreme Court 825
47. The overall examination of the opinions rendered by this Court on the References made by the then Governor General and the President shows that most diverse questions have been sent for opinion of this Court, which questions were of law and of public importance. The consensus of these opinions show that whenever question or questions are sent to this Court for opinion, the Court has always given its opinion. However, where the question does not admit of opinion, the Court has answered it accordingly. As to what the opinion of the Court would be, the same can only be decided on examining the material placed before the Court for seeking of the opinion. In our view, the present Reference and the question posed before the Court is within the domain of Article 186 of the Constitution.
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1989 Lahore 279
MUHAMMAD ASIM MALIK‑‑Appellant Versus ANWAR JALIL and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2012 Balochistan 57
MUHAMMAD KAMRAN MULLAHKHAIL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: High Court