Market
Market legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meanings.
Meaning of.
"Market", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13091
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Market"
1996 M L D 370
Messrs GULZAR & COMPANY‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE TOWN COMMITTEE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1991 C L C 118
through Chairman‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance, `
Court: LahoreP L D 2016 Sindh 201
Messrs RANIPUR SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. through Director Operations — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Agriculture Department and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1982 Lahore 710
MUHAMMAD GHIAS AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MARKET COMMITTEE, KAMALIA AND ANOTHER‑Respondents.
Court: S. 4(3) read with Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979), . , S. 4‑Salient functions of two statutory bodies constituted under Market Ordinance and Local Government Ordinance placed in juxtaposition, show both enactments to have conflicting parallel provisions and such provisions not capable of being administered by two bodies together Both bodies hence to have exclusive areas of operation with regard to common items‑Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 being an enactment of ‑a later date and containing a specific superseding clause, no other law of an earlier date (e.g. Market Ordinance of 1978), held, can override its provisions.‑Interpretation of statutes.S1994SCMR1048
ADMINISTRATOR, MARKET COMMITTEE,. KASUR and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 M L D 1051
GHULAM ABBAS LASHARI and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2005 Karachi 281
Messrs AHMED OIL MILLS (PVT.) LTD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY, MARKET COMMITTEE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1977 Lahore 115
ADAMIEE SUGAR MILLS LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MARKET COMMITTEE, BHAKKAR AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Art. 199 read with Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act (VI of 1939) and Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1940‑Claim for exemption to pay market fee merely on ground that molasses were bye product of sugarcane‑Factual matter involving leading of evidence and scrutiny of accounts for which Departmental adequate remedy available to petitioner‑Such matters, held. cannot be thrashed out in course of writ jurisdiction.‑Writ.P L D 2004 Lahore 686
Messrs CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LTD. through Director — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, AGRICULTUE DEPARTMENT through Secretary, — Respondents
Court: High Court1979 v L C 668
MAQBOOL AHMED AND 5 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF SIND THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERN OF SEND, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KARACHI AND 6 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: Karachi