Home Maxims & Terms Pods meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pods

Pods legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 SCMR 632 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Pods"Word "pods "

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pods", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13092

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pods"

PLD 1957
First Appeal No. 37 of 1954, decided on 9th October 1957.

P L D 1957 (W

Syed A. & M. W AZIR ALI-Defendant-Appellants Versus Haji ABU BAKER-Plaintiff-Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1983
Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 1978, decided on 10th April, 1983.

1983 P Cr

IKRAMUDDIN AND ANOTHER — Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 1999
Civil Petition No. 2001-L of 1998, decided on 17th December, 1998.

1999 P T D 1179

Messrs WORLD TRADE CORPORATION Versus THE EXCISE & SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LAHORE BENCH), LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1961
First Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1958, decided on 21st February 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

Before Waheeduddin Ahmad and A. S. Farooqi, JJ Versus MUHAMMAD ACHAR‑Respondent

Court: Under section 45 of the Contract Act, 1872, the right to claim performance of a promise in the case of joint promises rest; with them during their lifetime and one promisee alone cannot maintain a claim against the promisor in respect of a contract entered into by them. Where a contract was entered into between one promisor A and two promisees B and C but a suit based on a claim arising out of the contract was brought only by B and in the plaint it was nowhere alleged by him that the other promisee C had assigned his own rights to him or that he was not joined as a party to the claim arising out of the contract for some other cogent reasons, it was held that the contract entered into between the promisor A and the two promisees B and C could not be enforced by B‑alone.
MLD 2008
2008-April-3

2008 M L D 1002

ROOH-ULLAH and 2 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1972
First Civil Appeals Nos. 1 and 48 of 1961, decided on 16th October 1971.

P L D 1972 Karachi 459

Hajl FAIZ MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus Haji SOOMAR (RBPRESENTBD BY HEIRS) AND AN03HBR‑

Court: (b) Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 57‑Documents other than those enumerated in S. 57‑Cannot be taken judicial notice of, by Court. p.,466B
SCMR 1999
Civil Petition No.2001-L of 1998, decided on 17th December, 1998. .

1999SCMR632

Messrs WORLD TRADE, CORPORATION — Petitioner Versus EXCISE & SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LAHORE BENCH),

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1985
First Appeal No. 27 of 1980, decided on 30th August, 1980.

1985 C L C 2741

Mir GHULAM HYDER KHAN — Appellant Versus ABDUL QAYUM — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1972
Criminal Appeal No. K‑16 of 1971, decided on 9th February 1972.

1972 S C M R 121

MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHOSO‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 2016
Criminal Appeals Nos.163 and 164 of 2013, decided on 4th February, 2015.

2016 S C M R 621

TAIMOOR KHAN and another — Appellants Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan