Home Maxims & Terms Unprocessed meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Unprocessed

Unprocessed legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 SCMR 632 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Unprocessed "Word "unprocessed"

Connotation.

1999 PTD 1179 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Unprocessed"Word "unprocessed "

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Unprocessed", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13093

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Unprocessed"

SCMR 1969
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 316 of 1968, decided on 8th October 1968.

1969 S C M R 50

COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS, LIMITED Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 1999
Civil Petition No. 2001-L of 1998, decided on 17th December, 1998.

1999 P T D 1179

Messrs WORLD TRADE CORPORATION Versus THE EXCISE & SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LAHORE BENCH), LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1999
Civil Petition No.2001-L of 1998, decided on 17th December, 1998. .

1999SCMR632

Messrs WORLD TRADE, CORPORATION — Petitioner Versus EXCISE & SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (LAHORE BENCH),

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1969
Writ Petition No. 1844 of 1967, decided on 15th July 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 228

COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS LTD.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND

Court: Ss. 2(g) & 3 read with First Schd., item No. 15‑A, Explanation 10 inserted by Finance Act, 1966, S. 4 (iv)‑Excise duty on cotton fabrics‑Expression "manufacture" used in S. 2 (g)‑Comprehensive and wide enough to include all processes principal or ancillary which a finished product had to undergo before its completion‑Subjection of coarse cloth to refining processes‑Fully covered by expression "manufac ture"‑Manufacture of processed cotton cloth going through various processes of bleaching and calendaring etc., held, could legitimately be assessed to double duty in terms of Explanation 10, item 15‑ 4
PTD 2012
Complaints Nos. 92/Khi/Customs(35)270, 126/Khi/Customs(43)347, 127/Khi/Customs(44)348, 168/Khi/Customs(49)510, 178/Khi/Customs-(51)540 of 2012, decided on 12th April, 2012.

2012 P T D 1586

Messrs NADIA TEXTILES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LAHORE and 4 others Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2021
Writ Petition No.193 of 2017, decided on 22nd February, 2018.*

2021 P T D 725

SKP FOOD AND TRADING through Director Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chief (Exports), Islamabad and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PTD 2003
Complaint No. 120 of 2003, decided on 31st March, 2003.

2003 P T D 2542

Messrs AL‑FAIZ FURNITURE, JHELUM Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2000
C.O. No. 1172 (W) of 1996, decided on 1st September, 1997.

2000 P T D 697

J.M.D. MEDICARE LTD. and another Versus UNION OF INDIA and others

Court: 232 I T R 467
CLD 2023
2022-January-19

2023 C L D 1324

NAUMAN SAFDAR — Appellant Versus CITI LAB (COMPUTERIZED INNOVATIVE TESTS AND INVESTIGATION LAB) — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No. 121, of 1974, decided on 25th April, 1984.

1985 P T D 1

PAKISTAN PETROLEUM Ltd. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (CENTRAL), KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court