Home Maxims & Terms Instructions meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Instructions

Instructions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PLD 443 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
InstructionsPast practiceScope

Any instructions issued by public functionaries or past practice would not be a bar on law taking its own course.

1981 CLC 321 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Instruction issued by Government-Held, 7 functionaries of Government under legal obligation to follow such instructions unless same violative of any law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Instructions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13103

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Instructions"

PLC(CS) 2006
Constitutional Petition No.1088 of 1999, decided on 16th June, 2005.

2006 P L C (C

Dr. AASIA MENGAL PRINCIPAL, REGIONAL TRAINNING INSTITUTE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, QUETTA and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Population Welfare Division, Islamabad and others

Court: Quetta High Court
PTD 1998
Miscellaneous Civil Case No.203 of 1991, decided on 19th February, 1996.

1998 P T D 2311

DADAMCHAND KESHRIMAL & CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 222 I T R 433
PLD 1959
Writ Petition No. 486 of 1957, decided on 27th November, 1958.

P L D 1959 (W

ALLAH DIA and another — Petitioners Versus REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER (LANDS) WEST PAKISTAN and others‑ — Respondents

Court: Rehabilitation Resettlement Scheme, (Punjab Part I) prescri bed by Rehabilitation Commissioner (Lands) under section "7 (1) of the Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance, (XIX of 1948), as amended by the Pakistan (Economic Rehabilitation) (Amendment) Ordinance XVI of 1949, Para. 4 (c) & Instruction No. 60 (6) of the Instructions for the Deputy Rehabilitation Commissioner issued by the Rehabilitation Commissioner (Lands)‑Instruction neither punitive in character nor in conflict with para. 4 (c) of the Scheme‑Instruction fully effective only when exact area to which claimant is entitled not determinable.
PLC(CS) 1988
Appeal No.507.of 1987,, decided on 2nd.July, 1987.

1988 P L C (C S

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Home Department, Lahore and 4 others

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1979
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 116 of 1979, decided on 1st March, 1979.

1979 S C M R 327

FATEH KHAN‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, MIANWALI

Court: --Art. 199 read with Instructions No. 23/1/43/GG(P), dated 26‑2‑43 issued by Secretary to Governor‑General (Public)‑Stay of execution of sentence of death due to lapse of time‑Instructions contained in Memo. No. 23/1/43/GG(P) directory and in nature of guidelines to Home Department to be kept in view while dealing with mercy petitions‑Instructions, held, could not be enforced by High Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdictions.‑Sentence‑Mercy petition.
PLD 1978
Writ Petitions Nos. 2926, 3557, 3581, 3582, 3613, 3745 and 3778 of 1977, decided on 1st February 1978.

P L D 1978 Lahore 1355

SAEED AHMAD SHAH AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus COMMISSIONER/CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT

Court: --- Principle of-Orders passed in violation of principle of natural justice-Unlawful--Principle of natural justice requiring person proceeded against to be given reasonable opportunity of being heard-To be read into every law including martial law instructions unless shown to be specifically dispensed with-Martial Law Instruction (Zone B) No. 131.-Martial law.
CLC 1987
Constitutional Petition No. D‑526 of 1985, decided on 18th January, 1987.

1987 C L C 786

ASAD ZAHEERUDDIN and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SUB‑REGISTRAR "T" DIVISION‑1,

Court: Karachi
PTD 2002
I. T. C. No. 111 of 1993, decided on 15th November, 2001

2001 P T D 720

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1982
Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 175, 184, 185 to 197, 230, 231, 235 and 236 of 1982, decided on 17th March, 1982.

1982 S C M R 551

MUHAMMAD HAROON-Petitioner Versus DISTRICT FOOD CONTROLLER AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: (a) Martial Law Instructions, 1977 Zone A---
PLD 1982
Writ Petition No. 793 of 1981, beard on I 5th December, 1981.

P L D 1982 Lahore 153

Before Irshad Hassan Khan, J Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ S. 30‑Processions‑Licence‑District Magistrate though passing a very comprehensive order while turning'' down request of petitioner for grant of licence to take out procession but such order; read in its entirety, giving impression of District Magistrate having been mainly influenced by confidential instructions issued by Chief Secretary Instructions issued. by Chief Secretary‑Not binding on District Magistrate‑District Magistrate on other hand bound to apply his independent mind in discharge of his statutory duties under Police Act, 1861 irrespective of any instructions issued on executive side Impugned order in circumstances set aside and case remanded to District Magistrate for disposing of petitioner's application afresh on merits and strictly in accordance with law.‑Remand of case.