Home Maxims & Terms Voidable meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Voidable

Voidable legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 SCMR 1060 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Void" and 'voidable "

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Voidable", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13107

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Voidable"

PLD 1962
Revision No. 237 of 1961‑62, decided on 31st March 1962, District Rawalpindi.

P L D 1962 W

MUHAMMAD KHALAS‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1965
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 18 of 1961, decided on 23rd September 1964.

P L D 1965 (W

PRESSING FACTORY‑Appellants Versus MESSRS AKBER OIL MILLS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1963
5th November 1962, District Lyallpur

P L D 1963 W

QUTAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL KARIM‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 223 of 1977, decided on 17th June, 1984.

1984 S C M R 1118

HUSSAIN-Appellant Versus ALLAH BAKHSH-Respondent

Court: -- Art. 185(3) - Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957), S. 19-Central Government Notification No. S. R. O. 143, dated 1-4-1959-Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether High Court correctly interpreted notification to confine prohibition contained therein to transfers with consideration and thereby excluded its application to gifts because a gift transac tion is made without consideration, with particular reference to word "otherwise" occurring in para. (1) of said Notification.-Gift.
PLD 1976
Writ Petition No. 1707 of 1967, decided on 5th February 1976.

P L D 1976 Lahore 897

Before Aftab Hussain, J Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (CONSOLIDATION)

Court: Art. 199‑Writ‑Point not raised before appellate or revisional authority‑Cannot be allowed to be raised for first time before High Court.‑Writ.
PLD 1971
Suit No. 163 of 1969, decided on 31st March 1970.

P L D 1971 Karachi 109

Mst. SAJIDA SULTANA AND ANOTHER‑ — Plaintiffs Versus MESSRS EASTERN TRADERS AND 3 OTHERS‑ — Defendants

Court: (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXIII, r. 3 read with D. XXXII, r. 7‑Provisions of O. XXIII, r. 3 subject to provi sions of O. XXXII, r. 7‑Agreement voidable under O. XXXII, r. 7‑Not a lawful agreement under O. XXIII, r. 3 ; hence Cannot be decreed‑‑.Mst. Zarel Bibi and others v. Shamsuldin Khan and others P L D 1956 Kar. 150 and Western Electric Co. Ltd. v. Kailas Chand A I R 1940 Born. 60 dissented from.
SCMR 2010
Civil Appeal No.639 of 2006, decided on 11th February, 2010.

2010 SCMR 978

ABDUL REHMAN and others — Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD through L.Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1987
Second Appeal No.1 of 1984, decided on 5th March, 1987.

1987 M L D 2329

Mst. SULTAN JEHAN — Appellant Versus ISLAMIC ESTATE AND BUILDERS LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1988
Civil Miscellaneous Appeals Nos.298, 2034, 2035 and 2888, 3366 of 1987 in Suit No.35 of 1987, decided on 20th December, 1987.

1988 M L D 1180

Sheikh KHURSHID ANWAR‑‑Plaintiff Versus KAISAR ARTS AND CRAFTS and others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1979
Regular Second Appeal No. 888 of 1967, decided on 15th November 1978.

P L D 1979 -Lahore 237

BULAND KHAN AND 6 ANOTHER-Appellants Versus - MUHAMMAD RAFIQ AND 6 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- Alienation of minor's property-Legal necessity-Legal guardian empowered to alienate minor's property where such transaction necessitated for benefit of minor or his property-Payment of debt of a person related to minor, held, not one of such necessities Natural guardian mortgaging minor's immovable property for payment of land revenue payable by wife's father of first plaintiff and husband of real paternal aunt of plaintiff, guardian, held, exceeded his authority in making such transfer.-Legal necessity-Alienation.