Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Ancillary meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Ancillary

Ancillary legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 SCMR 1402 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases .....Incidental" and "ancillary"Meaning

Although words "incidental" and ,.ancillary" literally mean things of lesser or subordinate degree or of inconsequential nature, but in legislative interpretation, these words mean more than that.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Ancillary", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13147

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ancillary"

MLD 1989
Civil Appeals Nos. 2349-61 of 1988, decided, on 2nd August, 1988.

1989 M L D 2454

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS — Appellant Versus Messrs INDIAN OXYGEN Ltd. — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLC 1984
There can be a distinct substantive case filed before the Commission by a party complaining of an unfair labour practice that is likely to be committed, but which has not been committed, and a case, as the present, where the substantive case is one for punishment of an unfair labour practice already committed, but where some further unfair labour practice is apprehended and for the prevention of which an application by way of further statutory relief under regulation 32 (2) is filed. Sub‑regulation (2) of regulation 32 of the N. I. R. C. Regulations aptly covered both such cases. The latter type of case basically would not be one for ancillary relief to the main case, but for further statutory reliefs relatable to the main case filed under sub regulation (1) of regulation 32; the only special feature being that of the Commission would have to deal with the main case, under sections 25‑A, 34 or 53 of the I. R. O., and the application for further statutory reliefs under clause (a) of sub‑regulation (2) of regulation 32 of the N. I. R. C. Regulations. The matter regarding the further statutory reliefs would not be decided on affidavits alone, as in the case of matters like temporary injunction etc. the relevant procedure, as stated in clause (a) of sub‑regulation (2) would have to be adopted and the Union would have to submit itself to such inquiry as the Commis sion may hold and to produce such evidence, which it considers desirable in the said inquiry. But this does not mean that no interim order can be passed in such an application for further statutory relief, if it is incidental or ancillary to the main jurisdiction under sub regulation (2) of Regulation 32 of the National Industrial Commission Regulation.

1984 P L C 115

LEVER BROTHERS PAKISTAN LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN AND OTHBRS

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2024
Civil Petition No.3391 of 2024, decided on 9th August, 2024.

2024 S C M R 1806

KHALID alias MUHAMMAD KHALID and others — Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION), CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2011
2011-June-22

2011 C L D 1575

File No. 08/APPMA/CMTA/CCP/10/1709

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
PTD 2024
C.Ps. Nos. 560-K to 589-K of 2019, decided on 12th January, 2024.

2024 P T D 662

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, KARACHI Versus Messrs A.P. MOLLER MAERSK and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1991
Civil Appeal No. 48‑K of 1986, decided on 23rd April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 992

CUSTOMS and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ORIENT STRAW BOARD AND PAPER MILLS LTD ‑‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 2024
C.Ps. Nos. 560-K to 589-K of 2019, decided on 12th February, 2024.

2024 S C M R 741

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, KARACHI — Appellants Versus Messrs A.P. MOLLER MAERSK and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1959
Civil Appeal No. 84 of 1958, decided on 12th January 1959.

P L D 1959 Supreme Court (Pak

SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, LAYALLPUR‑Appellant Versus Ch. FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Court: "Manufacture" is defined in the Act S. 2 (f) as including any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of the manufactured product.
PTD 1999
Writ Petition No.30202 of 1997, decided on 18th November, 1997.

1999 P T D 3979

BHOJA REDDY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 231 I T R 47
PLD 1965
Miscellaneous Application No. 53 of 1964, decided on 11th May 1964.

P L D 1965 (W

SHER ADAM SHAH‑Petitioner Versus MIR ADAT SHAH AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library