Case decided
Case decided legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
S. 115-Words and phrases-Words "case" and "case decided" Meaning-Plaintiff filing application raising controversy between parties whether sufficient grounds for allowing amendment exist or not-Controversy affecting rights of parties-Order allowing amendment, held, falls within scope of "case decided".-[Words and phrases].
"Case decided", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13152
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Case decided"
P L D 1978 Quetta 107
MUHAMMAD UMAR AND 3 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus Munshi YAR MUHAMMAD — Respondent
Court: --- S. 115 read with S. 96-Revision-Words "case decided" in S. 115 Meaning-Remedy by way of revision--Not available if decision capable of correction in appeal-Intention of Legislature in providing scope of correction of irregularities committed by subordinate Courts both in revision and appeal.-Words and phrases-Revision (civil).P L D 2018 Lahore 491
ABDUL RAZZAQ and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN — Respondent
Court: High CourtBefore Zia Mehmood Muza, J
FEROZE DIN ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court:1994 S C M R 1991
Mian MUHAMMAD LUQMAN end 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FARIDA KHANAM and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1985 S C M R 221
ABDUL AZIZ SHAH and another — Appellants Versus ABDUL GHAFOOR and another — Respondents
Court: --Art.185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, rr. 1 & 6- Plaint--Limitation--Leave to appeal granted to consider question that even if other defects and omissions noticed in plaint be held to be mere irregularities, capable of being cured at discretion of Court, same could not be said about presentation of plaint by a pleader who did not hold a written power of Attorney from plaintiff or his next friend, with necessary consequence that plaint could not be regarded as having been validly presented within period of limitation allowed by law.--Plaint--Limitation.1998 M L D 1129
KARIM BAKHSH and 16 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2012 Y L R 2670
Haji GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus Haji ANWAR JAN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2004 M L D 278
MUHAMMAD JUMAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1994 M L D 190
Syed MASKIN SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Federal Shariat Court1999 C L C 1142
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ‑and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Court: Lahore ,