Home Maxims & Terms New meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

New

New legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 SCMR 916 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

"New"-Meaning.

1983 CLC 1678 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Word "New"-Means, not much used, lately made or produced, recent, modern, young or fresh-Word "new" may also be used in contradistinction to `old' or `used'.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "New", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13191

Precedents & Case Laws citing "New"

YLR 2019
Misc. Appeals Nos. 10, 14 to 23, 26, 27 and 50 of 2017, decided on 16th April, 2018.

2019 Y L R 574

AURORA BROADCASTING SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. and 13 others-Appellants Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 2006
2006-May-9

P L D 2006 Lahore 557

MUDASSER IQBAL BUTT — Appellant Versus SHAUKAT WAHAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2019
2018-November-23

2019 M L D 1207

The GILGIT PRESS CLUB through President — Appellant Versus The CHIEF EDITOR/PRINTER/PUBLISHER DAILY NEWS MART and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
CLC 2021
2020-October-19

2021 C L C 337

MUSAWAR KAMAL — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 1952
1952-March-18

P L D 1952 Lahore 222

CROWN‑Appellant Versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD FAIZ LUDHIANVI‑Accused Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeals Nos. 33, 34 and 35 of 1955, decided on 31st January 1956, from the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 205

Will of Frank Johnson deceased‑Appellant Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF STAMP DUTIES — Respondent

Court: (a) Estate Duty‑-------Law of State of New South Wales (Australia)‑Deceased's life interest to be included in assessable assets if property situated in New South Wales wherever deceased may be domiciled, but not if property is personal property situate outside New South Wales even if deceased was domiciled in New South Wales‑Charging of property within State's jurisdiction wherever its owner may be not contrary to inter national law‑Estate Duty Act (X of 1950), S. 20.
CLC 2000
Suits Nos.38, 37 and 39 of 1994, decided on 12th January, 1999

2000 C L C 1119

JAVADAN CEMENT LIMITED‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through

Court: Karachi
PLD 1949
Before J. W. Hearn, Financial Commissioner

P

Syed NAZIR HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus THE NEW DISTRICT BUS SERVICE Co. LTD.-Respondent

Court:
YLR 1999
Suits Nos.740 to 744 of 1983, decided on 19th May, 1999.

1999 Y L R 1260

PAKISTAN SECURITY PRINTING CORPORATION‑‑‑Applicant Versus MAJEED NIZAMI, EDITOR PUBLICATION PRINTER NAWA‑E-W AQT‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 1999
I.T.R. No.65 of 1979, decided on 6th February, 1997.

1999 P T D 1014

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus GHASITA MAL MELA RAM

Court: 226I T R 239