Desire
Desire legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Desire cannot be considered as a need because the latter implies want of something without which one cannot well do and element of compulsion is embodied therein.
A strong wish, a longing or craving for something.
"Desire", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1320
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Desire"
P L D 1977 Lahore 532
MANSOOR AHMED-Appellant Versus BASHIR HUSSAIN BABRI-Respondent
Court:1988 C L C 1289
Mahr ZAFAR AHMAD HARAJ‑‑Petitioner Versus Dr. KHAWAR ALI SHAH‑‑Respondent
Court: Election Tribunal Punjab1996 C L C 293
GHULAM HABIB RANA and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1987 Karachi 287
Mtts. RAFIQA BEGUM THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIRS‑Appellant Versus MRs. MAHMOODA WAHIDINA‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 15(2) (vii)‑Words "requires the premises in good faith" Meaning‑ "Desire" and "need"‑Distinction‑Requirement connotes that there should be an element of need.‑Words and phrases.2023 S C M R 1676
The STATE — Petitioner Versus Chaudhry MUHAMMAD USMAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1980 Lahore 176
SHAHID DAVID MALIK-Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Evidence Act (I of 1972), S. 138-Cross-examination, right of Petitioner candidate denying charge totally and raising a counter version but Discipline Committee not hearing Superintendent in support of his short report containing charge against petitioner candidate nor asking from him any question either in presence or behind back of petitioner in respect of plea raised by petitioner-Such course. if taken in presence of petitioner, petitioner .might have suggested some questions to committee or might have been allowed to cross-examine Superintendent and result might have been different-Right of cross-examination in such inquiries though not immutable yet depending upon circumstances of case same, held, could not be disallowed-Order of . Discipline Committee in circumstances declared to be suffering from an infirmity.-Cross-examination-Educational institutions.2009 C L C 1337
Dr. GUL KARIM KHAN — Petitioner Versus JAWAD HUSSAIN and others — Respondents
Court: N.-W.F.P. Election TribunalP L D 1972 Lahore 262
SHADI KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus KHAN SAEED‑UD‑DIN KHAN, SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1956 Privy Council 18
ERIC LANG-Appellant Versus JEAN WAUCHOPE LANG-Respondent
Court: Divorce-Ground for-Desertion- "Constructive desertion" Factum of desertion-Intention to bring the matrimonial union to an end-Proof of intention-Inferred from conduct, even in the presence of desire that probable result of conduct should not ensue-Marriage Act, 1928 (No. 3726) : State of Victoria (Australia).P L D 1959 (W
ABDUL NAJIB‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: