Home Maxims & Terms Lawful Authority meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Lawful Authority

Lawful Authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 PLD 404 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words "law", "lawful" and "lawful authority"

Import and connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Lawful Authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13208

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lawful Authority"

PLD 1978
17th January 1978

P L D 1978 Lahore 1353

MUKHTAR HASSAN-Petitioner Versus MAJOR KHAWAR HUSSAIN ETC.-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1986
Civil Appeals Nos. 83-K to 85-K of 1984, decided on 19th December, 1985.

1986 S C M R 1337

RAISUDDIN — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION and others — Respondents

Court: ---Art. 212(3)--Compulsory retirement--Very basis of departmental proceedings initiated against appellant was an ex parte report made by Martial Law Authority which was considered by Authorised Officer as binding on him and in his opinion he was only to inflict penalty on appellants--Direction of Martial Law Authority in said report was that "departmental action might be taken against appellant in accordance with law"--Held, directions of Martial Law Authorities were totally misconstrued by Authorised Officer for what he understood it to be was that he was required only to impose one of penalties, appellant already having been, held, guilty by Martial Law Authority--Authorised Officer was not competent to dispense with full-fledged departmental enquiry and order of dismissal passed against appellant was, therefore, wholly incompetent in law--Order of compulsory retirement of appellant from service quashed in circumstances. Civil services.
CLC 1982
Constitutional Petition No. D‑140 of 1982, decided on 28th April, 1982.

1982 C L C 2099

MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ AZMAT‑Petitioner Versus TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI PORT TRUST‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1987
Writ Petition No. 4704 of 1983, decided on 28th November, 1983.

1987 M L D 946

HASHAM ALI — Petitioner Versus MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1970
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 138 of 1970, decided on 9th February 1970.

P L D 1970 Lahore 741

Mian FAZAL AHMAD‑ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent

Court:
CLC 1986
First Rent Appeals Nos. ' 8 and 39 of 1971, decided on 27th March, 1986.

1986 C L C 2561

by legal heirs and 6 others‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. RESHAM BIBI and 8 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC 1971
Industrial Relations Case No. 22 of 1970, decided on 19th September 1970.

1971 P L C 214

WORKERS' UNION Versus MESSRS RENWICK & Co. LTD., KUSHTIA AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Labour Court East Pakistan
PLD 1980
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2972/13 of 1980, decided on 16th September 1980.

P L D 1980 Lahore 796

NAZIR HUSSAIN -Petitioner Versus Tim STATE-Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1970
Civil Appeal No. 58 of 1968, decided on 16th March 1970.

1970 S C M R 629

WALI MUHAMMAD AND 7 OTHERS-Appellants Versus THE BORDER AREA COMMITTEE, BAHAWALNAGAR- Respondent

Court: Art. 98 read with West Pakistan Border Area Regulation, 1959 Martial Law Regulation Zone B) No. 9 paras. 15 & 16-Bjjective orders in case re ported as P L D 1965 S C 623 passed when orders of Martial Law authorities including Border Area Committee were immune from judicial scrutiny under Martial Law Regulations promul gated before 7th June 1962--Such Regulations having been repealed on promulgation of Constitution (1962) and Art. 98 Incorporated fn such Constitution, High Court held, could judicially review acts done or proceeding taken by Border Area Committee and declare it without lawful authority notwithstanding ouster of its Jurisdiction under pares. 15 & 16 of Regulation.
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 3854 of 1977, decided on 6th February 1978.

1978L228

Ch. SULTAN ALI-Petitioner Versus APPELLATE BOARD, MINISTRY OF HEALTH ETc.-Respondents

Court: -- S. 45 read with Drugs (Appellate Board) Rules, 1976 and Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976, r. 16-Petitioner a licensed manufacturer of drugs under old Drugs Act submitting application for renewal of license under new law as required by Rules-Facts revealing petitioner having been dealt with left handedly and adverse action having been taken rather irresponsibly in rejecting petitioner's application-Appeal filed by petitioner heard by Board including two such members who complained of having not been treated with respect by petitioner and launching criminal proceedings against petitioner through Martial Law authorities in consequence whereof petitioner arrested and remained in jail until released on bail-Board in circumstances, held, could not be said to have acted in manner to let justice appear to be done-Justice not only to be done but has manifestly to appear being done-Order of appellate Board, held, not with lawful authority-Case remitted back to be decided keeping in view background of case, facts as well as law.Remand of case.