Home Maxims & Terms Volenti non fit injuria meaning in Urdu
Maxim Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Volenti non fit injuria

Volenti non fit injuria legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 PLD 513 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

"Volenti non fit injuria" (A person cannot complain of any act he passively assents to).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Volenti non fit injuria", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13211

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Volenti non fit injuria"

PLD 1981
Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 1980, decided on 16th May, 1981.

P L D 1981 Lahore 651

ALLAH YAR‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2016
C.R. No.231 of 2014, decided on 28th March, 2016.

2016 Y L R 1497

MUHAMMAD SAJID AMIN — Petitioner Versus RIZWAN AHMED BHATTI and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
MLD 1995
Civil Miscellaneous Application No.2245 of 1990 in Suit No.54 of 1987, decided on 24th January, 1994.

1995 M L D 803

ABDUL RAZAK ADAMJEE and another‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, and

Court: Karachi
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeal No. 27 of 1955, decided or, 26th January 1957, from the High Court of Australia.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 191

REARDON SMITH LINE LIMITED‑Appellant Versus AUSTRALIAN WHEAT BOARD‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1963
Criminal Appeal No. 98 of 1962, decided on 29th November 1962.

P L D 1963 Supreme Court 51

Syed ALI NAWAZ GARDEZI‑Appellant Versus LT.‑COL. MUHAMMAD YUSUF‑Respondent

Court: (b) Marriage‑ (Private International Law)‑Validity of "form" of marriage to be judged by lex loci contractus‑"Capacity" to enter into marriage bond to be determined according to law of domicile of party concerned‑Brook v. Brook (1861) 9 H L C 1921 and Halsbury's "Laws of England," Vol. 7, p. 91, para. 165, III Edition ref..
MLD 1997
Original Suit No. 126 of 1971, decided on 18th December, 1980.

1997 M L D 2308

SHAH BASHIR ALAM and 2 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus Messrs AROKEY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. ‑‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
PLD 1989
Constitutional Petition No.S‑25 of 1989, decided on 18th May. 1989.

P L D 1989 Karachi 513

SHAUKAT HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RUBINA and others‑‑Respondents

Court: The absence of notice may entail punishment as provided in section 7(2) but it should not be interpreted as revocation of Talaq by itself, without any other positive and reliable evidence, and without reckoning it as divorce at all. p.545 K