Home Maxims & Terms Capital Expenditure meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Capital Expenditure

Capital Expenditure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1969 PTD 33 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Capital expenditure Agreement with ruler of Native State for monopoly rights, tax concessions and immunity from labour and industrial laws for a term of years Percentage of annual profits paid to ruler under agreement Capital expenditure-Non resident Income Receipt by cheque Remand by appellate Tribunal to provide opportunity to let in evidence regarding mode of sending cheques and request of assessee

Whether proper Income tax Act, 1922, Ss. 4(1) (a), 10 (xv),& 33.

1960 PLD 365 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Capital Expenditure?"Capital expenditure" for purposes of Income?tax Act (XI of 1922) does not necessarily have the sense of "capital" as used in Business Profits Tax Act (XXI of 1947). Vallambrose Rubber Company case 5 T C 529 ; British Insulated and Halsby Cables Limited case 1926 A C 205 ; City of London Contract Corporation Limited case 2 T C 239 ; Tata Hydro?Electric Agencies case 64 I A 215 ; Golden Horse Shoe Limited case (1934) 1 K B 548 ; Gas Lighting Improvement Company case 1923 A C 723 and Assam?Bengal Cement Company Limited case A I R 1953 Cal. 368 rel.

1960 PTD 855 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Capital Expenditure Capital Expenditure

Capital expenditure" for purposes of Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) does not necessarily have the sense of "capital" as used in Business Profits Tax Act (XXI of 1947).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Capital Expenditure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13331

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Capital Expenditure"

CLD 2009
2009-July-10

2009 C L D 1687

MUHAMMAD SULEMAN KANJIANI and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus DADEX ETERNIT LTD. through Chief Executive and 4 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PTD 1999
Miscellaneous Civil Case No.70 of 1992, decided on 15th A15ri1, 1996.

1999 P T D 929

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M.P. AUDHYOGIK VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

Court: 225 I T R 782
PTD 2001
I.T.A. No.897/LB of 1998, decided on 29th March, 2000:

2001 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1997
Civil Appeals Nos. 1575, 1576 and 1577 to 1582 of 1980, decided on 11th February, 1997.

1997 P T D 2114

N/A

Court: 224 I T R 342
PTD 2000
O.P. Nos.24656 and 17756 of 1998, decided on 18th December, 1998.

2000 P T D 3573

MAHESH B. SHAH Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 238 I T R 130
PTD 2001
T.C. No.1234 of 1984 (Reference No.1053 of 1984), decided on 11th February, 1998.

2001 P T D 3324

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus ASHER TEXTILES LTD.

Court: 240 I T R 483
PTD 2002
Tax Case No. 1092 of 1982 (Reference No.653 of 1982), decided on 25th June, 1998.

2002 P T D 1657

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus CROMPTON ENGINEERING CO. LTD. (now Best and Crompton Engineering Ltd.)

Court: 242 I T R 317
PTD 2000
Income-tax Case No.27 of .1993, decided on 3rd July, 1998.

2000 P T D 2365

V. B. C. INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 236 I T R 335
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No. 114 of 1973, decided on 23rd October, 1984.

1985 P T D 359

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus Messrs PAKISTAN PROGRESSIVE CEMENT INDUSTRIES Ltd.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2000
References Nos. 15 and 16 of 1993, decided on 17th June, 1997. ----Scientific research---Capital expenditure on scientific research---Condition precedent for allowance---Capital expenditure must have been incurred in previous year---Not necessary that ownership over land and building should have been acquired in previous year ---Assessee purchasing industrial sheds alongwith land from State Industries Development Corporation in previous year---Final registration made subsequently---Not relevant ---Assessee entitled to deduction under S.35---Explanation 2 to S.35 is declaratory--Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.35.

2000 P T D 3113

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus KEEN PESTICIDES (P.) LTD.

Court: 237 I T R 545