An act of court shall prejudice no man
An act of court shall prejudice no man legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"An act of Court shall prejudice no man"-Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S. 16 (2)-Applicability of maxim-Default in compliance of tentative order-Tenant having two options before him-Either to deposit arrears of rent in cash or getting previously deposited arrears in another Court transferred to Rent Controller concerned-Tenant moving leisurely in matter and showing no anxiety-Maxim that an act of Court shall prejudice no man, held, had no application.
"An act of court shall prejudice no man", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13346
Precedents & Case Laws citing "An act of court shall prejudice no man"
P L D 1984 Quetta 99
Mst. RABIA BEGUM‑Appellant Versus Mian KHAN TALWALA‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑ Ss. .3 & IS‑Ejectment application‑Examination of witnesses Record showing that case adjourned by Rent Controller on some occasions when witnesses of landlady present and Rent Controller making observation that landlady failed to produce witnesses ‑Obser vation of Rent Controller, held, unjustified‑Held further, it was duty of Rent Controller to see record himself in order to ascertain if his orders on various applications made by landlady for summoning witnesses through Court have been complied with‑Presiding Officer of a Court of law entrusted with settlement of disputes is under obligation to do justice and he is not absolved of that obligation by inadvertent admission of counsel even regarding a matter which is not borne on record‑Such duty if kept in view, unnecessary litigation resulting in unnecessary loss of time and money of parties might be avoided. Principle of law that an act of Court shall prejudice no man, held further, is founded upon justice and good sense and affords a certain guide for administration of law.‑Witness‑Maxim.1984 C L C 3253
Dit. BURJOR M. AN KLESARIA ‑Appellant Versus Mrs. ZENOBI A AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1983 C L C 2853 (2)
INSHALLAH BEGUM‑Appellant Versus SHAMIM AKHTAR‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1994 C L C 1018
MUHAMMAD BOOTA and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Sh. ABDUL WAHID‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2001 SCMR 533
LADHA KHAN and others — Appellants Versus Mst. BHIRANWAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2019 P T D (Trib
Messrs FALCON (PVT.) LTD. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB, KARACHI
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate TribunalP L D 1989 Supreme Court 146
RASHAD EHSAN and others‑‑ Appellants Versus BASHIR AHMAD and another‑‑Respondents
Court:2020 C L C 1716
Dr. MUHAMMAD JAMAL and another — Petitioners Versus SULTAN MUHAMMAD — Respondent
Court: Balochistan2017 Y L R 971
IMTIAZ — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)1984 C L C 2769
ZOHRA BEGUM‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN BURMAH‑SHELL Ltd.‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi