Offender
Offender legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Offender].
"Offender", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13453
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Offender"
P L D 2014 Balochistan 100
GHULAM DASTAGIR and 3 others — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2016 Islamabad 53
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Appellant Versus ASAD JAVED and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 S C M R 1514
ASJAD JAVED alias JAVED AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 M L D 504
Mumtaz Naz and another — Petitioners Versus Azad Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir through Chief Secretary and 11 others — Respondents
Court: High Court (AJ&K)P L D 1965 Dacca 387
EUSUF HAJI alias HAJI EUSUFUDDIN SHAHANA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Opposite‑Party
Court:1975 P Cr
MUHAMNIAD AFZAL‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Opponent
Court: KarachiP L D 1989 Lahore 279
MUHAMMAD ASIM MALIK‑‑Appellant Versus ANWAR JALIL and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1969 Peshawar 226
THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus MAZDOOR‑Respondent
Court: Probation of Offenders Ordinance (XLV of 1960), S. 5 Expression "the Court may .instead of sentencing the person at once, make a probation order"‑Magistrate convicting accused and sentencing him to one year's R. I. but at the same time in view of accused being first‑offender and young man" releasing him on probation under S. 5‑Composite order not proper‑Mere fact, however, that by inadvertence the Magistrate while releasing offender on probation has also at same time nominated a sentence does not render order regarding probation unlawful‑Interpretation. of subsection (3) of S. 5‑State v. Fazli Khaliq P L D 1967 Pesh. 105 dissented from.2001 S C M R 232
DIL BAGH HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2017 Sindh 592
SAEED AHMED KALHORO — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court