Home Maxims & Terms Interested witness meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Interested witness

Interested witness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 SCMR 1784 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Interested witness"

Meaning.

1993 PCRLJ 323 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesTerm `interested witness'MeaningInterested witness is one who has a motive to falsely implicate an accused.

[Witness].

1991 PCRLJ 301 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases'Interested witness'

Interested witness is one who has some motive to implicate another person falsely.

1990 PLD 161 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

witness," defined.

1962 PLD 269 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases "Interested" witness-"One who has a motive for falsely implicating an accused person".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Interested witness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13458

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Interested witness"

SCMR 1971
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 181 of 1971, decided on 8th October 1971.

1971 S C M R 659

OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus The STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 2000
Criminal Petition No. 26-P of 1999, decided on 5th August, 199

20061 S C M R 163

RAQIB KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1996
Criminal Appeal No.630 and Murder Reference No. 234 of 1993, heard on 24th October, 1995.

1996 P Cr

ASGHAR BEG‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2016
2014-November-20

2016 P Cr

RIAZ KHAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1962
Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1962, decided on 16th April 1962.

P L D 1962 Supreme Court 269

NAZIR AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: (b) Witness-----"Interested" eye-witness-Corroboration, whether necessary-"Corroboration" does not necessarily mean "word" of an independent witness, but "anything in circumstances" which tends to satisfy Court that witness has spoken truth-"Corroboration" in case of "eye-witness" not necessarily to be of same probative force as in case of an approver-"Corroboration" by "circumstances" : "number" of persons named as culprits consistent with kind of crime committed; persons named, such as were "expected" to join in attack-"Corroboration" may be spelt out of circumstances in regard to some of the accused while not against others-Niaz v. The State P L D 1960 S C (Pak.) 387 explained.
SCMR 1997
Criminal Appeals Nos..440 of 1994 and 441 of 1993, decided on 17th October, 1995

1997SCMR1284

ASLAM and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2002
Criminal Appeal No.495 of 2000, decided on 10th September, 2001.

2002 SCMR 99

FEROZE KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1998
Criminal Appeal No. 526 of 1995, decided on 8th June, 1998.

1998 S C M R 1768

NAZEER AHMAD alias NAZEERA‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2024
Criminal Petition No.887-L of 2013, decided on 17th April, 2024.

2024 S C M R 1085

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus KHIZAR HAYAT and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2020
Criminal Appeal No. (s) 75 of 2019, decided on 11th October, 2019.

2020 Y L R 942

MOR KHAN and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Balochistan (Sibi Bench)