Home Maxims & Terms Stock Exchange meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Stock Exchange

Stock Exchange legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Stock Exchange", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13488

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stock Exchange"

PTD 2001
Civil Appeal No. 1727(NT) of 1998 with Civil Appeal No. 7571 of 1995 decided on 2nd March, 2001.

2001 P T D 2679

STOCK EXCHANGE, AHMEDABAD Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX

Court: 248 I T R 209
CLC 1992
Applications for grant of Certificates of Registration of Stock Exchange at Islamabad, decided on 29th August, 1991.

1992 C L C 1213

Court: Corporate Law Authority
PLD 1995
Writ Petition No.10826 of 1994, decided on 30th May, 1995.

P L D 1995 Lahore 572

TARIQ MAJEED CHAUDHRY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LTD.

Court: ‑‑‑‑Ss. 2(1) & 9‑‑‑Securities and Exchange Ordinance (XVII of 1969); Ss.3 & 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199‑‑‑Power and jurisdiction of Wafaqi Mohtasib to deal with complaints of maladministration in relation to internal affairs of Stock Exchange‑‑‑Stock Exchange‑‑‑Expression "agency" as defined in S.2(1), Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983, whether applicable to "Stock Exchange"‑‑‑Vires of order of Wafaqi Mohtasib requiring Stock Exchange to resolve dispute between two contestants for membership of Stock Exchange‑‑‑Stock Exchange was admittedly a company established by private individuals and not by Federal Government which had been registered under laws relating to registration of companies‑‑‑Federal Government was not holding any shares muchless controlling shares in such company entitling it to exercise administrative control through its employees, officers or nominated or elected directors or members of management over the affairs and functions of Stock Exchange‑‑ Merely because provisions in Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969 had been made to supersede governing body of Stock Exchange as a matter of penalty in the event of contravention of any of the provisions of Ordinance, same would not make Stock Exchange as an institution controlled by Federal Government‑‑‑Main object of establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib was to undertake investigation as regards maladministration in departments of Federal Government by public functionaries, i.e. employees and officers and statutory corporation and other institutions established or controlled by Federal Government‑‑‑Stock Exchange was an institution which was not controlled by Federal Government in the sense as such expression had been used in definition of "Agency" as used in Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983‑‑‑Wafaqi Mohtasib thus, had no power to interfere in the internal affairs of private institutions‑‑‑Besides inherent defect in the jurisdiction of Wafaqi Mohtasib in the matter in question, petitioner was not heard before order in question was passed against him, therefore, same also suffered from violation of principle of natural justice ‑‑Order of Wafaqi Mohtasib suffering from lack of jurisdiction was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect.‑‑Natural justice, principle of.
CLD 2024
2022-January-27

2024 C L D 580

Before Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Mahmood A. Khan, JJ PAKISTAN STOCK EXCHANGE LIMITED through Duly Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2006
Commercial Appeal No. 9 of 2004, heard on 18th May, 2006.

2006 C L D 988

LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE — Appellant Versus LAHORE APPELLATE BENCH S&EC — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 1999
Special Civil Application No.9089 of 1995; decided on 17th January, 1998.

1999 P T D 3698

STOCK EXCHANGE, AHMEDABAD Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 231 I T R 906
CLD 2019
N/A

2019 C L D 626

LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR (ICW) SECP and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2003
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.595 of 2001, decided 9th July, 2001.

2003 C L D 1587

ISLAMABAD STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LIMITED, ISLAMABAD through Secretary‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FIRST PUNJAB MODARABA through Punjab Madaraba Services (Private) Limited, and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2005
Appeal No.9 of 2004, decided on 30th July, 2004.

2005 C L D 275

LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LIMITED, KARACHI‑‑‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLD 1975
Letters Patent Appeal No. 32 of 1964/Pauper Appeal No. 74 of 1963, decided on 14th January 1975.

P L D 1975 Karachi 556

MUHAMMAD ANSAR-UL-ISLAM QARNI, ADVOCATE-Appellant Versus KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE LTD., KARACHI-Respondents

Court: