Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Printed Circuit meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Printed Circuit

Printed Circuit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Printed Circuit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13521

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Printed Circuit"

YLR 2002
Criminal Appeals Nos.1682, 1683, 1624, 1628 and 1643 of 2000, decided on 8th August, 2002.

2002 Y L R 1811

Air Marshal (Retd.) WAQAR AZIM and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2020
Customs Appeal No.K-428 of 2012, decided on 5th March, 2019.

2020 P T D (Trib

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Assistant Collector of Customs Versus Messrs M. SALEEM ENGINEERING WORKS and another

Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2016
Appeal No.K-657/CU of 2014, decided on 22nd January, 2015.

2016 P T D (Trib

Messrs CREATIVE ELECTRONICS (PVT.) LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another

Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal
PLC 2005
Cases Nos.4A(97) and 24(96) of 2003-K of decided on 20th April, 2005.

2005 P L C 357

UNITED BANK LIMITED through General Secretary Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED through SVP/GM-ERD and another

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PLC(CS) 2024
C.Ps. Nos.D-2781 and 2782 of 2024, decided on 20th June, 2024.

2024 P L C (C

MEHBOOB ALI CHANNA and another Versus SUHAIL MUHAMMAD LEGHARI REGISTRAR OF SINDH HIGH COURT and others

Court: Sindh High Court
SCMR 1968
Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1965, decided on 27th November 1967.

1968 SCMR 320

SHER MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus ABDUL KHALIQ AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2022
N/A

2022 Y L R 901

Raja FAHAD — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
PLD 1995
Constitutional Petition No.D‑323 of 1994, decided on 24th November, 1994.

P L D 1995 Karachi 59

MUHAMMAD UMER‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑Art. 198‑‑‑ Jurisdiction of Benches of each High Court established under Art.198 of the Constitution extends to the whole Province and sometimes beyond that Province but in exceptional cases as in cases of interim protective bail.‑‑Jurisdiction‑‑Bail. p. 64 A
PTD 1964
The Central Board of Revenue has decided that films in the hands of their producer and of their purchaser should be treated as stock‑in‑trade. In arriving at the closing stock valuation the assessee's figure should be accepted if it appears reasonable. In this connection it should be borne in mind that since our rates are on a sliding scale and losses are not allowed to be carried forward an assessee may be tempted to manipulate this figure. As a general rule the greatest deterioration in the value of a film takes place in the first year, The Income. tax Officer will have to decide for himself what figures to adopt in such a case since the `life' of a film is subject to great variation. It has been suggested that a film may be valued at 40 per cent. of its cost after one year, 15 per cent. after two years and there after nothing. The actual percentages that should be adopted in the case of each film are however matters that must be decided on the merits of each case and no hard and fast rates can be laid down.

1964 P T D 106

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus MODERN THEATRES LTD.

Court: Madras (India)
YLR 2004
Suit No.678 of 2002 and C.M.A. No.6652 of 2002, decided on 27th January, 2003.

2004K4148

R.B. AVARI ENTERPRISES (PVT.), LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus SHAHEEN INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library