Corrigendum
Corrigendum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Means things to be corrected.
Words "notification" and "corrigendum"-Meaning, scope and distinction.
"Corrigendum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13545
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Corrigendum"
2016 P T D 1096
Messrs TRADE LINK CORPORATION and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: SindhP L D 1987 Peshawar 68
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus SIKANDAR KHAN AND OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 4 & 18‑Acquisition of land‑Material date for purpose of compensation‑Assessment of compensation how made‑In acquisi tion cases, material date 'for purpose of compensation to be paid to landowners for the acquired land, held, would be the date of notifi cation under S. 4‑For determination of such compensation one year's average of land sold in the vicinity before date of notification is to be taken into consideration as criterion for assessing price of acquired land.‑Compensation.2017 M L D 1209
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Appellant Versus ELECTION COMMISSION and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2008 P T D 1762
Messrs AZAM TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2007 C L C 203
MUHAMMAD HANIF — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSIONER and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Northern Areas Chief Court2008 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan2003 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Customs, Excises and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal2024 C L C 857
PAKISTAN B. TECH HONORS ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION through Muhammad Khursheed Shinwari — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2015 G B L R 148
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 2 others — Petitioners Versus Malik MUSHTAQ AHMED KHAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Appellate Court2002 C L C 681
Messrs VULCAN COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Additional Secretary, and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore