Question of Law and Fact
Question of Law and Fact legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
The questions posed by the Applicant/Department were essentially questions of fact seeking determination whether the documentary evidence relied upon by the Respondent before the Customs Appellate Tribunal was false and fabricated
Whether questions involving factual inquiry could be entertained by the High Court in reference jurisdiction?
Held: It is settled law that a question involving inquiry into facts is not a question of law and cannot be considered by the High Court in a reference under S. 196 of the Customs Act, 1969
Findings of fact rest with the Tribunal, except where such findings are perverse or contrary to the material on record
A mixed question of law and fact may, however, be examined by the High Court in its reference jurisdiction.
Law and fact-Distinction-Inference of fact distinguishable from inference of law-Inference drawn from evidentiary facts and documents as to existence or non-existence of another fact-Such inference ac inference of fact-Question as to inference-A question of fact.
[DECIDED ON MERITS AND FACTS]
"Question of Law and Fact", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13559
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Question of Law and Fact"
1993 P T D 1404
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus MAHENDRA KUMAR BANSAL
Court: 200 I T R 3362007 S C M R 852
BANK OF CREDITS AND COMMERCE and others — Petitioners Versus ASRAR HASSAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1990 S C M R 23
LAL DIN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF and others — Respondents
Court: (a) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 M.L.R.115.-2007 C L D 344
Messrs MULTIMED MARKETERS through Managing Partner and 7 others — Appellants Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED through Manager — Respondent
Court: Lahore2019 C L D 1254
ABDUL SATTAR — Appellant Versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED through Manager/Attorney and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)P L D 1973 Lahore 416
MESSRS MIAN ABDUL RAHIM & SONS — Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI — Respondent
Court:1978 S C M R 264
CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus MAULA DAD AHD OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1986 M L D 672
SHAHNAZ AKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus MANZOOR ALI‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2011 Lahore 102
MUHAMMAD YOUNAS KHAN LODHI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1961 W P (Rev
MUHAMMAD SADIQ‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM RASUL‑Respondent
Court: