PTD
2005
I.T.As. Nos.1060/LB to 1063/LB, 1229/LB to 1232/LB and 1250/LB of 2002, decided on 31st December, 2004.
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD
2007
Tax References Nos. 1 to 4 of 2005, decided on 22nd December, 2006.
Messrs KABIR MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PESHAWAR
Court: Peshawar High Court
CLC
1989
Intra‑Court Appeal No.282 in Writ Petition No.510 of 1984, decided on 25th April, 1989.
MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ Appellant Versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
Court: Lahore
PTD
2002
I.T.A. No. 4206/LB of 20u0, decided on 29th October, 2001.
N/A
Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD
1999
Writ Petitions No.s 1122 and 1189 of 1995 decided on 18th February, 1999.
Messrs FRONTIER CERAMICS Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Peshawar High Court
PTD
2003
Complaint No. 173 of 2002, decided on 16th May, 2002.
Messrs PRIME CHROMIUM (PVT.).LTD., HATTAR Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD
2007
Sales Tax Appeal No.Q-79 of 2001, decided on 4th October, 2005.
N/A
Court: Customs, Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
SCMR
1996
Civil Petition No. 125 of 1996, decided on 18th March, 1996.
FLYING KRAFT PAPER MILLS (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD
1994
Income-tax Reference No.49 of 1987, decided on 15th May, 1991.
MINING MACHINERY AND EXPLOSIVES (P.) LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 202 ITR 710
PLC
2001
‑‑‑‑S.O. 11‑A‑‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S.38(3‑a)‑‑ Closure of establishment‑‑-Management filed application under S..O.11‑A of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 for closure of factory on account of financial losses‑‑ Pending said application an agreement was arrived at between the Management and Collective Bargaining Agent whereby employees agreed to resign after getting agreed benefits and majority of the employees on getting said benefits, submitted their individual resignations‑‑‑Collective Bargaining Agent and Management submitted joint consent application in Labour Court for permission to close down factory in terms of agreement, but said application was dismissed by the Labour Court‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Set‑up of Collective Bargaining Agent which had executed agreement with management having been changed during that period, new set‑up had taken over which was not party to the agreement arrived at between previous set‑up and management‑‑‑New set‑up of Collective Bargaining Agent having certain reservations about agreement arrived at between previous set‑up and management, Labour Court should have taken decision on application for closing of factory after providing opportunity of hearing to new set‑up and adducing evidence in that respect‑‑‑Case was remanded to be decided on merits after hearing parties.
RECKITT & COLMAN OF PAKISTAN LTD. and another Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT No.3, KARACHI
Court: Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal
