Sufficient Interest
Sufficient Interest legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Definition not found in search database.
"Sufficient Interest", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13579
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sufficient Interest"
2015 C L C 978
NAYYER KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi Cantt. and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1978 Lahore 1456
ABDUL SHAKOOR AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus ALLAH DITTA-Respondent
Court: S. 5-Contlonation of delay-Appellant not submitting application for copy of trial Court's judgment initially alongwith application for copies of judgment and decree of first appellate Court not taking sufficient interest in obtaining such copy despite it having been made clear in High Court's order asking him to file such copy at his own risk in respect of period of limitation-First application for copy submitted quite late when record sent to High Court, hence, returned but appellant not caring to verify from his counsel's clerk till 9-7-1978 about fate of his application-Appellant coming to High Court on 10-7-1978, copy prepared very next day yet no body taking care to collect .it till 8-10-1978-Appellant, held, not careful and vigilant to obtain copy within period of limitation-Period of limitation having expired on 1-8-1978 appellant could at most take advantage of intervening period due to vacations up to 11-9-1978-Case, held, one of absolute negligence on part of appellants and no reason for condonation of delay. -Condonation of delay.1999SCMR2883
ARDESHIR COWASJEE and 10 others — Appellants Versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY (KMC), KARACHI
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2003 Karachi 477
CLIFTON CENTRE ASSOCIATION (CCA), CLIFTON, KARACHI through General Secretary — Plaintiff Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT through Nazim-e-Aala, Municipal Building, Karachi
Court: High CourtP L D 1989 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 53
NOOR‑UL‑AMIN, BARRISTER‑AT‑LAW ADVOCATE, SUPREME COURT, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR Petitioner Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT and 2 others Non-‑Petitioners
Court: ‑‑S. 18, proviso as added by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1986, S.2‑‑Amendment operating as restriction on vote of a member of Assembly alone‑ Essentials‑‑Where majority of members of a political party in the Assembly do not favour resolution for a vote of no‑confidence against Prime Minister, vote of a member of that political party cast in favour of resolution, would not be counted.1984 C L C 354
Haji MUHAMMAD UMAR‑Petitioner Versus THE OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2002 P Cr
JAVED IBRAHIM PARA CHA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Cabinet Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1991 Supreme Court 596
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB, LAHORE‑‑Appellant Versus KOURA alias KARAM ILAHI and another‑‑Respondents
Court:1985 C L C 466
MUHAMMAD SHARIF-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN and 3 others-Respondents
Court: Lahore2010 P L D Lahore 605
ATTA ULLAH KHAN MALIK — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan
Court: High Court