Home Maxims & Terms Sues meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Sues

Sues legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 SCMR 847 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Sues"

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Sues", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13592

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sues"

PLD 1972
N/A

P L D 1972 Karachi 215

ALLARAKHA‑Applicant Versus BABOO BROTHERS TRANSPORT Co., KARACHI -Opponents

Court: High Court
PLD 1963
31st October 1962

P L D 1963 (W

Ch. NAZAR MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus SHAFIQ AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1991
Writ Petition No.7286 of 1990, decided on 5th June, 1991.

1991CLC1826

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 9 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. FATIMA and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1955
Miscellaneous No. 23 of 1953, decided on 2nd November, 1954.

P L D 1955 Sind 370

Rana MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ‑Plaintiff Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF and 2 others‑Defendants

Court:
PLD 1960
Civil Revision No. 53 of 1960, decided on 19th May 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

RAIS‑UD‑DIN AND ANOTHER‑Defendant‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ZABEDA KHATOON‑Plaintiff — Respondent

Court: (a) Pauper‑---Suit by‑Application for permission to sue as pauper‑Counsel for plaintiff, on date fixed for evidence, asking for time to make up deficiency in court‑fee‑Action amounts to conceding that plaintiff was not pauper‑Such implied admis sion by counsel binding on plaintiff‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIII‑Rudhu Ram v. Uttam Chand A 1 R 1928 Lah. 726 held not relevant.
PLD 1960
Civil Revision No. 204 of 1957, decided on 11th December 1959.

P L D 1960 (W

Mst. AMNA BEGUM‑Plaintiff‑Petitioner Versus NISAR AHMAD‑Defendant‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1965
Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 663 of 1960, decided on 8th July 1964.

P L D 1965 Dacca 531

SURATAN NESSA BIBI‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD NAIMUDDIN MONDAL AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: O. XXXIII, Rr. S do 7 and S. 149‑Petition to sue in forma pauperis‑Deemed plaint from date of filing‑Rejection or refusal of petition‑Petition deemed unstamped plaint and Court competent under S. 149 to permit applicant to pay requisite court fee within time allowed by Court‑Suit in such case deemed, for purpose of limitation, instituted on date of filing application for leave to .sue as pauper 43‑C W N 636 dissented from.
CLC 1987
Civil Revision Application No. 270 of 1984, dated 7th April, 1987.

1987 C L C 1376

PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION‑‑Applicant Versus ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1987
Civil Miscellaneous Application No.775 of 1983 in Judicial Miscellaneous No. 40 of 1975 and Suit No.133 of 1984, decided on 23rd December, 1983.

P L D 1987 Karachi 660

ARK NAVIGATION COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD. and another‑‑Appellants Versus ESSO PAKISTAN and another‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1956
Suit No. 948 of 1955, Reference, decided on 12 September 1955.

P L D 1956 Sind 201

AIJAZ BEGUM‑Plaintiff Versus BUNYAD HASAN PARDESI‑Defendant

Court: