Home Maxims & Terms Muslim Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Muslim Law

Muslim Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 PLD 31 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Muslim Law Maintenance

Duty of the parents to provide maintenance to their children and it is moral obligation upon the parents to provide the means to support the life of their children.

2001 SCMR 34 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Muslim LawGiftDelivery of possession

Mere recital in the gift deed about the delivery of possession would not be sufficient to prove possession unless . livery of possession is positively proved by cogent .evidence.

2001 PCRLJ 188 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Muslim LawMarriage

Marriage is a civil contract and every Muslim of sound mind, who has attained puberty, can enter into contract of marriage and is void only when it is brought about without his or her consent.

2001 MLD 186 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Muslim LawGiftDelivery of possessionRecital with regard to delivery of possession in gift deedHanding over of possession is necessary for completion of giftRecital in the document of gift as to delivery of possession is of no help where the possession had not been deliveredNot necessary in every case of gift that the subject-matter should be physically handed over

Only such possession is to be handed over as is capable of delivery.

2001 MLD 112 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Muslim LawWillValidityChallenge toRevision petition

Will executed in favour of respondent with regard to licence of "Tazia Dari" as well as "Mutwaliship" of "Imam Bargah" had been challenged alleging same to be fake being result of undue influence and having been executed during "Marzul-Maut" of the testator

Allegations that the "will" was the result of coercion, undue influence and was executed when its executant was under imminent danger to his life (Marz-ul-Maut), had been controverted and rebutted through cogent and unrebutted evidence of witnesses as well as through documents

Courts below concurrently dismissed suit whereby validity of "will" was challenged

Concurrent findings of fact based on unrebutted evidence on record could not be interfered with in revision by High Court.

2001 MLD 1 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Muslim LawInheritance"Tarka (estate) of deceasedDefinition

Tarka (estate) of deceased consists of immovable or movable properties, money and all other articles which the deceased owned and over which he had 'complete control and dominion so as to enter into the transaction of sale, exchange, transfer, gift in respect of such immovable and movable properties, moneys and other goods/articles

Amount of group insurance could not form estate or Tarka of the deceased.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Muslim Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13643

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Muslim Law"

PLD 1981
Civil Revision No. 70 of 1977 decided on 11th March 1981

PLD 1981 Peshawar 129

MUZAFFAR KHAN- Petitioner Versus Mst. ROSHAN JAN AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Gifts----------Customs-----General Code of Tribal Customs though an authentic document nevertheless there being evidence to contrary on other side plaintiff bound to bring on record evidence to show custom in disputed area having not permitted making of gifts Gift----------Custom
PLD 1956
Civil Original Case No. 49 of 1955. Application for with drawal of arbitration proceedings decided on 30th April 1956.

P L D 1956 (W

Malik FATEH MUHAMMAD KHAN and others‑ Plaintiffs Versus Malkani BHAG BHARI‑Defendant

Court:
PLD 1961
18th May 1961

P L D 1961 Supreme Court 468

KHAIR DIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2002
Civil Revision No.272‑D of 1986, decided on 29th January, 2002.

2002 C L C 733

SAJJAD MUNIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. MURAD KHATOON and others‑‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2011
Civil Revision Petition No.116 of 2004, decided on 20th June, 2011.

2011 Y L R 2980

Mst. HAKIM BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus RAB NAWAZ KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2003
Civil Petition No.2736 of 2001, decided on 14th June, 2003.

2003 S C M R 1535

through Legal Heirs and 2 others‑‑‑petitioners Versus Mst. KARAM KHATOON

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1993
R.S.A. No. 98 of 1972, decided on 26th April, .1993.

1993 C L C 2058

Mst. GHULAM SIDDIQA and other‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. NOOR BEGUM through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1984
Civil Appeal No. 74 of 1981 in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 41-R of 1981, decided on 24th June, 1984.

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 394

MUZAFFAR KHAN-Appellant Versus Mst. ROSHAN JAN AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: -- S. 3(2) - West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (V of 1962), .S. 2 as amended by West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act (Amendment) Ordinance (XI1I of 1983)
PLD 1953
Privy Council Appeal No. 38 of 1951, decided on 12th January 1953, from Ceylon.

P L D 1953 Privy Council 14

NOORUL MUHEETHA‑Appellant Versus SITTIE RAFEEKA LEYAUDEEN and others Respondents

Court:
SCMR 2005
Civil Appeal No.487 of 2000, decided on 15th March, 2005.

2005 S C M R 1231

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan