Home Maxims & Terms Residual Property Scheme No. IX meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Residual Property Scheme No. IX

Residual Property Scheme No. IX legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 CLC 1391 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9-Transfer of property

Disputed shop whether or not a separate and independent unit and as such available for transfer under Scheme IX, held, a question of fact-Administrator Residual Property visiting site in presence of parties and not finding any shop there-Order of Administrator cancelling transfer of shop in name of petitioner-Unexceptionable.-[Question of fact].

1984 CLC 1383 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Art. 9-Residual Property Scheme No. IX-Pakistan Administration of Evacuee Property Act (XII of 1957), S. 55-Evacuee property-Order of Settlement Commissioner regarding declaration of in dispute as evacuee property passed without consider in property important and relevant documents-Order, held, arbitrary, illegal and without lawful authority and set aside.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Residual Property Scheme No. IX", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13806

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Residual Property Scheme No. IX"

CLC 1984
Writ Petition No. 4‑R of 1982, decided on 20th March, 1983.

1984 C L C 1383

ABDULLAH‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/ADMINISTRATOR (RP), MULTAN

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 231‑R of 1981, decided on 10th March, 1982.

1982 S C M R 1138

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AKHTAR AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: -----Para. 19 read with Para. 1(e) "Competent authority"‑Conflict existing between para. 19 and definition of "competent authority" in para. 1 (e)‑‑Former must prevail‑Competent authority, hence, held, Committee as provided in para. 19 and not Deputy Administrator, Resi dual Property‑ Interpretation of statutes.
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 275 of 1987, decided on 30th March, 1991.

1994 S C M R 563

SANAULLAH ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1985
Writ Petition No.1010/R of 1979, decided on 5th July, 1984.

1985 C L C 369

MUHAMMAD SADIQ-Appellant Versus ADMINISTRATOR, RESIDUAL PROPERTIES, MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN/ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1989
SHAHID ULLAH BEG and another‑‑Respondents Writ Petition No.17‑R of 1988, heard on 14th February, 1989.

1989 C L C 1265

Before Allah Nawaz, J Versus SHAHID ULLAH BEG and another‑‑Respondents Writ Petition No.17‑R of 1988, heard on 14th February, 1989.

Court: Lahore
CLC 1992
Writ Petition No. 751 of 1987, heard on 20th November, 1991.

1992 C L C 1991

MUHAMMAD SAEED and 11 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition No. 930 of 1980, decided on 25th January, 1981.

1986 S C M R 766

WALI MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1984
Writ Petition No. 13‑R of 1983, decided on 16th April, 1983.

1984 C L C 1391

ABDUL HAMEED‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL ‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1419 of 1980, decided on 8th December, 1980.

1986 S C M R 1398

SHAUKAT ALI — Petitioner. Versus SAEEDA KHATOON and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1987
Writ Petition No.449‑R of 1979, decided on 26th October, 1986.

1987 C L C 664

SHAFQAT HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus SAKINA BEGUM and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore