Home Maxims & Terms Land Settlement Scheme meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Land Settlement Scheme

Land Settlement Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 CLC 2378 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 15-Ejectment application on ground that rented premises were closed for 4 months-Landlord introducing new pleas of personal requirement and subletting of premises by tenant during his evidence-Held, new pleas could only be advanced either by way of amendment of rent application or by filing separate proceedings and not by introducing them in evidence.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Land Settlement Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13814

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Land Settlement Scheme"

SCMR 1973
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 379 of 1966, decided on 7th October 1966.

1973 S C M R 230

MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND 5 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus AHMAD ALI KHAN‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1970
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 150 of 1967, decided on 13th October 1967.

1970 S C M R 31

JHANDA KHAN-Petitioner Versus NAWAB DIN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1976
Civil Appeal No., 154 of 1970, decided on 30th January 1976

1976 S C M R 197

JHANDA KHAN- Appellant Versus NAWAB DIN AND 2 OTHERS‑ ‑Respondent

Court: ---O. XXII, r. 3 read with 11 Abatement Contention that deceased appellant alone prosecuted litigation, his legal representatives had no knowledge of litigation, and that it was on receipt of a letter from counsel that they learnt of pendency of appeal and of requirement of bringing names of legal representatives on record‑‑‑Deceased survived '' by three grown‑rip sons and one unmarried daughter and proved to have lived with one of such sons tilt his death‑‑‑Contention, held, hardly convincing‑‑Abatement of appeal not set aside Abatement.
SCMR 1988
Civil Appeal No.174 of 1978, decided on 17th October, 1887.

1988 S C M R 1324

PIR MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus BARKAT ALI through his Legal Heirs and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1984
1983-November-15

1984 C L C 2378

GHULAM MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD USMAN AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1985
Second Appeal No. 106 of 1977, decided on 9th May, 1985.

1985 M L D 1104

BACHO [deceased] through legal heirs and 17 others — Appellants Versus BARKAT ALI — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1985
Civil Appeals Nos. 193 and 194 of 1977, decided on 19th April, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1669

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and others — Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER LAND,

Court: High Court
PLD 1979
Constitutional Petition No. 1115 of 1973, decided on 14th October 1978.

P L D 1979 Karachi 176

Petitioners Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL

Court:
SCMR 2002
Civil Appeal No. 145 of 1995, decided on 6th February, 2002.

2002 S C M R 829

MUHAMMAD SARWAR and 5 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ALI and 18 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1982
SARDAR IRSHADUL HASSAN AND 7 others ‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 1843/R of 1976, decided on 29th August, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 831

Before Ghazanfar Ali Gondal and Fazal‑i‑Mahmood, JJ Versus SARDAR IRSHADUL HASSAN AND 7 others ‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 1843/R of 1976, decided on 29th August, 1982.

Court: Art. 199 ‑‑ Writ ‑ Estoppel ‑ Petitioner cannot be allowed to reprobate what he bad approbated before Tribunal below.‑Estoppel.